Skip to content
Edward F & Vickie S O'Gara Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Edward F & Vickie S O'Gara Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Edward F & Vickie S O'Gara Family Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Edward F & Vickie S O'Gara Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $141k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
5
’18
11
’19
12
’20
10
’21
9
’22
9
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.0MEducation$467kHealth$247kHuman Services$109kYouth Development$86kInternational$54kCommunity Improvement$25kFood & Nutrition$18kOther$0
02FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA FOUNDATION$20,000
SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS$17,000
IDAHO YOUTH RANCH$15,000
FACES OF HOPE FOUNDATION$14,999
JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC$14,000
LEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER$14,000
HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOODRIVER VALLEY$10,000
ST LUKES WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC$10,000
BALD MOUNTAIN RESCUE FUND INC$10,000
HUNGER COALITION$6,000
ST LUKES MCCALL FOUNDATION INC$5,000
THE ADVOCATES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $274k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHEPHERDS HOME INC: $20k → 8%LEMHI COUNTY CRISIS INTERVETION INC: $20k → 14%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $15k → 8%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $1k → 7%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $15k → 8%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $500 → 7%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $15k → 8%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOODRIVER VALLEY: $20k → 7%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $15k → 8%HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOODRIVER VALLEY: $13k → 7%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $13k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 8%HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOODRIVER VALLEY: $12k → 7%HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOODRIVER VALLEY: $10k → 7%BALD MOUNTAIN RESCUE FUND INC: $10k → 7%BALD MOUNTAIN RESCUE FUND INC: $10k → 7%BALD MOUNTAIN RESCUE FUND INC: $10k → 7%HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOODRIVER VALLEY: $10k → 7%BALD MOUNTAIN RESCUE FUND INC: $10k → 7%BALD MOUNTAIN RESCUE FUND INC: $5k → 7%BALD MOUNTAIN RESCUE FUND INC: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Edward F & Vickie S O'Gara Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Edward F & Vickie S O'Gara Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$867k · 17 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$867k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+62%

Still filing today

76%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IY
    IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $83k · revenue +140%
  • SA
    SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $72k · revenue +113%
  • HA
    HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOOD RIVER VALLEY INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $65k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SH
    SHEPHERDS HOME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +62%
  • LC
    LEMHI COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +68%
  • CI
    CENTRAL IDAHO MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Luke Community Hospital

The mission of st. luke community healthcare is to remain an integral component of the communities of the mission valley through the delivery of personal, compassionate, quality health care in a dignified manner that values our patients,…

Health
2
Island Hospital Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise funds to support island health and its commitment to community health in and around anacortes, washington.

Unclassified
3
St Luke Community Healthcare Foundation

The foundation is dedicated to improving the care and comfort of patients at st. luke community hospital.

Health
4
Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Inc

We, saint alphonsus health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint alphonsus regional medical center is a member of saint…

Health
5
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
6
Saint Alphonsus Health System Inc

We, saint alphonsus health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.saint alphonsus health system is a member of trinity health.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
8
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Children's Hospital & Medical Center Foundation

Children's nebraska foundation (the foundation) was created in 1981 to raise awareness and manage and distribute funds to support children's hospital & medical center's (the hospital) premier pediatric services and programs. as an advocate…

Health
11
Idaho Community Foundation Inc

The idaho community foundation strengthens communities through philanthropy, elevating nonprofit impact, and connecting idahoans to create a place where everyone can contribute to thriving communities.

Philanthropy
12
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Nonprofit Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is One Stone Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $2,959,916 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM+1 more: $14,450 · PhilanthropyBISHOP KELLY FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · OtherBISHOP KELL…ST LUKE'S MCCALL FOUNDATION: $39,500 · OtherST LUKE'S M…BRACKETT REFUGEE EDUCATION FUND: $36,750 · OtherBRACKETT RE…IDAHO NONPROFIT CENTER INC: $25,000 · OtherIDAHO NONPR…CENTRAL IDAHO MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherFACES OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $14,999 · Other+6 more: $36,500 · Other+6 moreIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $83,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOOD RIVER VALLEY INC: $64,500 · Human ServicesBald Mountain Rescue Fund: $46,000 · Human ServicesPADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $38,900 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDS HOME INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesLEMHI COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION INC: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $71,500 · EducationLEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC: $68,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $48,000 · EducationJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC: $14,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · HealthST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $44,500 · HealthBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $18,000 · Food & NutritionBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $3,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$2,974,366Other$417,749Human Services$273,900Education$204,000Health$104,500Food & Nutrition$18,000Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $2,959,916 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBISHOP KELLY FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $83,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $71,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC: $68,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetHOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOOD RIVER VALLEY INC: $64,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $48,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBald Mountain Rescue Fund: $46,000 over 6y, 37% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $44,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetST LUKE'S MCCALL FOUNDATION: $39,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $38,900 over 4y, 10.0% of budgetIDAHO NONPROFIT CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSHEPHERDS HOME INC: $20,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetLEMHI COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $14,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTailhook Educational Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Found…St Luke's Health Syst…Laura Moore Cunningha…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Idaho Community Foundation IncID19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward F & Vickie S O'Gara Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward F & Vickie S O'Gara Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward F & Vickie S O'Gara Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home