Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward B Evans and Ruth Todd Evans Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$66kHealth$48kReligion$33kEnvironment$10kCommunity Improvement$8kArts & Culture$8kPhilanthropy$7kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$84k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Curebound$2,280
SD Botanical Garden$2,200
Us against Alzheimer's$2,000
Washington Unity Methodist Church$1,000
Nelson County Genealogical Society$800
Wreaths Across America$750
Alzheimer's Association$500
Parkinson's Society$500
Children of the American Revolution$425
Crown Colony Society$170
Church of the Nativity$100
Junior League of SDC$80
Rancho Santa Fe Art Guild$75
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 21%GO CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%RANCHO SANTA FE WOMEN'S FUND: $2k → 11%CAS DE AMPARO: $200 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
NY
OR
IA
IN
OH
CA
MO
KY
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 26 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
33

Total granted

$158k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+37%

Still filing today

35%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PUTNAM FOUNDATION DBA TIMKEN MUSEUM OF ART
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +57%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +145%
  • WA
    Words Alive
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • PP
    PADRES PEDAL FOR THE CAUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • UR
    UNIVERSITYOF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF ME
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
3
California Certified Organic Farmers Inc

Ccof advances organic agriculture for a healthy world. we accomplish our purpose through organic certification, education, advocacy and promotion. we envision a world where organic is the norm.

—
4
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
5
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
6
Variety - the Childrens Charity International

We empower children who are sick, disadvantaged, or living with disabilities through life-changing programs that provide medical care, mobility, education, and support to live without limits.

International
7
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
10
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
11
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
12
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa De Amparo; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN DIEGO QUAIL BOTANIC GARDEN: $51,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO QUAIL BOTANIC GARDENST JAMES CHURCH: $23,000 · OtherST JAMES CHURCHMS SOCIETY: $22,350 · OtherMS SOCIETYRSF SENIOR CENTER: $7,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE NATIVITY: $6,550 · Other+51 more: $58,660 · Other+51 moreTHE PUTNAM FOUNDATION DBA TIMKEN MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWords Alive: $4,600 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureCUREBOUND: $3,280 · HealthUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $2,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $750 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $700 · HealthPEDAL THE CAUSE: $3,100 · Human ServicesRancho Santa Fe Womens Fund: $2,300 · Human ServicesGo Campaign: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION INC: $4,635 · EnvironmentVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $4,500 · Civil RightsKENTER CANYON PARENT SUPPORT GROUP: $2,900 · Education
Other$168,560Arts & Culture$9,850Health$6,730Human Services$6,600Environment$4,635Civil Rights$4,500Education$2,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PUTNAM FOUNDATION DBA TIMKEN MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION INC: $4,635 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWords Alive: $4,600 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCUREBOUND: $3,280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $3,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Vision of Children: $2,950 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKENTER CANYON PARENT SUPPORT GROUP: $2,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COUNTRY FRIENDS: $1,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGo Campaign: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN DIEGO INC: $765 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL VOLUNTEERS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDORCHESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCasa De Amparo: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PUTNAM FOUNDATION DBA TIMKEN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Words Alive ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds The Vision of Children ↗
  • Who funds KENTER CANYON PARENT SUPPORT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Rancho Santa Fe Womens Fund ↗
  • Who funds USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S ↗
  • Who funds THE COUNTRY FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Go Campaign ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Sempra Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward B Evans and Ruth Todd Evans Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward B Evans and Ruth Todd Evans Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edward B Evans and Ruth Todd Evans Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Edward B Evans and Ruth Todd Evans Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward B Evans and Ruth Todd Evans Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph