Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward & Karen Levene Char Found Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$49kEducation$8kFood & Nutrition$7kHealth$7kEnvironment$6kPhilanthropy$3kHuman Services$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLIMMERGLASS FESTIVAL$20,000
TOWN HALL ARTS CENTER$15,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
WSKG PUBLIC TV & RADIO$8,000
MANCHESTER COMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD$5,000
SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$3,500
MERCK FOREST & FARMLAND$3,000
FRIENDS OF HILDENE INC$2,500
SKIDMORE COLLEGE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BURR & BURTON ACADEMY$2,500
VIBRANT LITTLETON$2,000
ROD SERLING FOUNDATION$2,000
STRATTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
TEMPLE CONCORD$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD: $2k → 5%HAAT FORCE SOUTH METRO: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
2
Southwestern Vermont Medical Center

Southwestern vermont health care exists to provide exceptional health care and comfort to the people we serve. see schedule o for additional details.

Health
3
Southwestern Vermont Health Care Corporation

To care for and comfort our patients, residents, and their loved ones and to improve the health status of the communities we serve. the purpose of the organization is also to promote and support the development and maintenance of a highly…

Health
4
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

—
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Sawtooth Mountain Clinic Inc

To provide access to high quality, comprehensive, primary healthcare in cook county to all users, regardless of financial ability to pay for service.

Health
9
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
10
Svhc Realty Inc

Svhc realty,inc. was formed for the purpose of acting as a supporting organization to southwestern vermont healthcare corporation (svhc), itself a taxexempt entity, which, among other activities, operates southwestern vermont medical…

Health
11
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
12
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwestern Vermont Healthcare Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Haat Force South Metro Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLIMMERGLASS FESTIVAL: $20,000 · OtherGLIMMERGLASS FESTIVALTOWN HALL ARTS CENTER: $15,000 · OtherTOWN HALL ARTS CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWSKG PUBLIC TV & RADIO: $8,000 · OtherWSKG PUBLIC TV & RADIOMANCHESTER COMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD: $5,000 · OtherMANCHESTER COMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARDMERCK FOREST & FARMLAND: $3,000 · Other+11 more: $18,000 · Other+11 moreBURR & BURTON SEMINARY: $2,500 · EducationSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationPOMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $1,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · HealthDOCTORS CARE: $2,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF HILDENE INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD: $1,500 · Human ServicesHAAT Force South Metro Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$77,000Education$6,000Health$5,500Arts & Culture$2,500Human Services$2,500Food & Nutrition$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBURR & BURTON SEMINARY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOCTORS CARE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HILDENE INC ↗
  • Who funds BURR & BURTON SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SWALLOW HILL MUSIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DOCTORS CARE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD ↗
  • Who funds HAAT Force South Metro Inc ↗
  • Who funds POMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward & Karen Levene Char Found Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward & Karen Levene Char Found Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Burr & Burton Seminary: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Edward & Karen Levene Char Found Trust?

Find your warmest path to Edward & Karen Levene Char Found Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward & Karen Levene Char Found’s filings →

More from the funding graph