· Private foundation
Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of EDWARD AND JUNE KELLOGG FOUNDATION DBA KELLOGG FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LACASA | $35,000 |
| KALKASKA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $25,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,623 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| COURAGE REINS | $3,600 |
| TROOP 336 | $1,300 |
| NAPLES THERAPUETIC RIDING CENTER | $1,067 |
| PACK 629 | $1,000 |
| TROOP 629 | $1,000 |
| HOWELL HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| FREE REIN | $500 |
| LIVINGSTON ARTS COUNCIL | $500 |
| CHARITY BICYCLES | $146 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LLACASA8× · 2017–2025 · $312k · revenue +165%
- RLRECYCLE LIVINGSTON INC4× · 2018–2024 · $200k · revenue +40% · 51% of their budget
- CUCLEARY UNIVERSITY6× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF ROOKERY BAY INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue +32%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $31k
- LLESAone grant, 2017 · $23k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…
The mission of harm reduction is to reduce substance abuse and related activities in a respectful manner in collaboration with the user
Listening ear crisis center in mt. pleasant, michigan, empowers individuals and families across mid and northern michigan by providing quality services and safe, affordable housing. with a history of serving over 30,000 people annually,…
Mission: to advocate for safe, nurturing, and permanent connections to family and community so children who have experienced abuse or neglect have the opportunity to thrive. significant activities: at casa of larimer county (clc), we…
Life Anew, Inc. uses restorative justice to build healthier communities, promote peace and create a space to heal from harms caused by broken relationships.
A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.
Healing with Horseplay is an animal protection and welfare organization that rescues animals, primarily horses, that are abused, neglected or to be sent to slaughter and then rehabilitates them. After training them they will be sold to…
The clinic for the rehabilitation of wildlife is a teaching hospital and visitor center dedicated to the saving of wildlife through state-of-the-art veterinary care, research, education, and conservation medicine.
Our mission is to provide safe, loving foster homes for animals in need, offering them a second chance at life while working tirelessly to find them permanent, caring families. we are dedicated to rescue, rehabilitation, and responsible…
To provide services for abandoned, stray or unwanted animals while they await life long homes. our vision is that all animals are cared for with dignity and respect.
Our mission is to save the lives of animals while enriching the lives of humans.
The organization serves as a temporary rescue for equines and other animals that are rescued from mistreatment. we provide care and eventual adoption.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Livingston County Catholic Charities and the most unlike its peers is Northwest Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LACASA ↗
- Who funds RECYCLE LIVINGSTON INC ↗
- Who funds Charity Bicycles Inc ↗
- Who funds CLEARY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Recovery Advocates in Livingston Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ROOKERY BAY INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT COMMISSION AIR INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR SUCCESS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FREE REIN INC ↗
- Who funds Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HOWELL MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds Saprea ↗
- Who funds THE LIVING PLANET INC ↗
- Who funds Courage Reins ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Robert W & Maxine C Parker Foundation Inc · Ted and Jane Von Voigtlander Foundation · Positive Step Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Livingston County United Way · Credit Unions Chartered in the State of 222 Lake Trust Credit Union · Dte Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Friends of Rookery Bay Inc — 0% of income from government
- Youth Haven Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.