Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$517kEducation$440kHuman Services$397kEnvironment$246kYouth Development$230kHealth$95kEmployment$52kPublic Safety & Disaster$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $61k
$1,300
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LACASA$35,000
KALKASKA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,500
Individual grant recipient$8,300
Individual grant recipient$5,623
Individual grant recipient$5,000
COURAGE REINS$3,600
TROOP 336$1,300
NAPLES THERAPUETIC RIDING CENTER$1,067
TROOP 629$1,000
PACK 629$1,000
HOWELL HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
FREE REIN$500
LIVINGSTON ARTS COUNCIL$500
CHARITY BICYCLES$146
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $1k → 10%CHARITY BICYCLES: $19k → 5%CHARITY BICYCLES: $18k → 5%CHARITY BICYCLES: $18k → 5%CHARITY BICYCLES: $146 → 5%CLARA'S HOPE: $2k → 5%LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIE: $5k → 5%LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIE: $3k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IN
PA
CA
UT
VA
TN
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 33 repeat orgs$184k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
42

Total granted

$2.0M
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+12%

Still filing today

36%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • L
    LACASA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $312k · revenue +165%
  • RL
    RECYCLE LIVINGSTON INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $200k · revenue +40% · 51% of their budget
  • CU
    CLEARY UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ROOKERY BAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue +32%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $31k
  • L
    LESA
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
2
Harm Reduction Michigan

The mission of harm reduction is to reduce substance abuse and related activities in a respectful manner in collaboration with the user

Health
3
Crisis Center Inc

Listening ear crisis center in mt. pleasant, michigan, empowers individuals and families across mid and northern michigan by providing quality services and safe, affordable housing. with a history of serving over 30,000 people annually,…

Human Services
4
Court Appointed Special Advocate Inc

Mission: to advocate for safe, nurturing, and permanent connections to family and community so children who have experienced abuse or neglect have the opportunity to thrive. significant activities: at casa of larimer county (clc), we…

—
5
Life Anew Restorative Justice

Life Anew, Inc. uses restorative justice to build healthier communities, promote peace and create a space to heal from harms caused by broken relationships.

Crime & Legal
6
Lake County Crisis Center

A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.

—
7
Healing With Horseplay Inc

Healing with Horseplay is an animal protection and welfare organization that rescues animals, primarily horses, that are abused, neglected or to be sent to slaughter and then rehabilitates them. After training them they will be sold to…

Animals
8
Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc

The clinic for the rehabilitation of wildlife is a teaching hospital and visitor center dedicated to the saving of wildlife through state-of-the-art veterinary care, research, education, and conservation medicine.

Animals
9
Redemption Road Rescue of Michigan

Our mission is to provide safe, loving foster homes for animals in need, offering them a second chance at life while working tirelessly to find them permanent, caring families. we are dedicated to rescue, rehabilitation, and responsible…

Animals
10
Humane Society of the Lakes

To provide services for abandoned, stray or unwanted animals while they await life long homes. our vision is that all animals are cared for with dignity and respect.

Animals
11
Lenawee Humane Society

Our mission is to save the lives of animals while enriching the lives of humans.

Animals
12
Last Chance Ranch Inc

The organization serves as a temporary rescue for equines and other animals that are rescued from mistreatment. we provide care and eventual adoption.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Livingston County Catholic Charities; the most unlike its peers is Northwest Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KALKASKA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $526,859 · OtherKALKASKA UNITED METHODIST CHURCHKALKASKA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $400,000 · OtherKALKASKA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGINGLACASA: $312,318 · OtherLACASACHILD CONNECT FOR SUCCESS: $135,728 · OtherCHILD CONNECT FOR SUCCESS+55 more: $362,436 · Other+55 moreRECYCLE LIVINGSTON INC: $200,194 · EnvironmentRECYCLE LI…Recovery Advocates in Livingston Inc: $36,154 · HealthGREAT COMMISSION AIR INC: $33,993 · HealthNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $11,067 · HealthSaprea: $5,000 · HealthCourage Reins: $3,600 · Health+2 more: $3,195 · HealthCharity Bicycles Inc: $54,826 · Human ServicesLIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8,005 · Human Services+2 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesCLEARY UNIVERSITY: $51,378 · Education+2 more: $1,750 · EducationCENTER FOR SUCCESS NETWORK: $25,750 · Community ImprovementHOWELL MAIN STREET INC: $8,510 · Community ImprovementFREE REIN INC: $25,315 · Animals
Other$1,737,341Environment$200,194Health$93,009Human Services$65,831Education$53,128Community Improvement$34,260Animals$25,315

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLACASA: $312,318 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetRECYCLE LIVINGSTON INC: $200,194 over 4y, 51% of budgetCharity Bicycles Inc: $54,826 over 4y, 19% of budgetCLEARY UNIVERSITY: $51,378 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRecovery Advocates in Livingston Inc: $36,154 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ROOKERY BAY INC: $35,600 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGREAT COMMISSION AIR INC: $33,993 over 7y, 12% of budgetCENTER FOR SUCCESS NETWORK: $25,750 over 2y, 13% of budgetFREE REIN INC: $25,315 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $11,067 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHOWELL MAIN STREET INC: $8,510 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8,005 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LIVING PLANET INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaprea: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClara's Hope: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLIVINGSTON ARTS COUNCIL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENTISTRY FROM THE HEART INC: $695 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY MISSIONS COMPANY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $220 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LACASA ↗
  • Who funds RECYCLE LIVINGSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Bicycles Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLEARY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Recovery Advocates in Livingston Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ROOKERY BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT COMMISSION AIR INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SUCCESS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FREE REIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOWELL MAIN STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON COUNTY CATHOLIC CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds THE LIVING PLANET INC ↗
  • Who funds Saprea ↗
  • Who funds Courage Reins ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robert W & Maxine C Parker Foundation IncMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robert W & Maxine C Parker Foundation Inc · Ted and Jane Von Voigtlander Foundation · Positive Step Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Livingston County United Way · Credit Unions Chartered in the State of 222 Lake Trust Credit Union · DTE Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Friends of Rookery Bay Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward and June Kellogg Foundation Dba Kellogg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph