Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward And Janet Ahlstrand Family Found

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Animals$36kHuman Services$36kHousing & Shelter$22kCrime & Legal$13kRecreation & Sports$12kPhilanthropy$8kYouth Development$6kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$464k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOICES FOR CHILDREN$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
YMCA OF BOULDER$2,500
SMALL CHAMPIONS$2,500
TGTHR$2,000
BRECKENRIDGE OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENTER$2,000
BOULDER HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
FAITHFULLY K9 SERVICES DOGS$2,000
MARIPOSA DR FOUNDATION$1,500
SUMMIT COUNTY MOUNTAIN RESCUE$1,500
CARRY THE LOAD$1,500
WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY$1,500
SUMMIT COUNTY HORSE CENTER$1,500
WOUNDED WORRIORS FOUNDATION$1,038
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIGHT FUTURES: $500 → 18%A Soldiers Child Foundation: $500 → 9%Bright Futures: $500 → 18%Bright Futures: $500 → 18%Vail Valley Charitable Fund: $500 → 7%TGTHR: $5k → 12%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $500 → 7%TGTHR: $4k → 12%Forward Steps Foudnation: $2k → 12%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $500 → 7%TGTHR: $2k → 12%TGTHR: $2k → 12%SMALL CHAMPIONS: $3k → 7%TGTHR: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$116k · 22 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
27

Total granted

$116k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+6%

Still filing today

59%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthCivil RightsRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ATTENTION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +30%
  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • SC
    SMALL CHAMPIONS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • VF
    Volunteer Florida Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • FS
    Forward Steps Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +65%
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
2
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
3
Ark-Valley Humane Society Inc

Ark-Valley Humane Society's (AVHS) Mission is ensuring the welfare of companion animals through compassion and care. AVHS operated an open-admission animal shelter for Chaffee County, Colorado.

Animals
4
Northern Colorado Wildlife Center

The mission of Northern Colorado Wildlife Center a 501c3 independent nonprofit is to protect wildlife and the places they call home through wildlife rescue wildlife rehabilitation education and advocacy.

Animals
5
Colorado Horse Rescue

Our mission is to build a better future for horses by continuously reimagining what's possible and creating a reality where safe solutions exist for every horse.

Animals
6
Humane Society of the South Platte Valley Inc

HSSPV's mission is to be a leader in saving lives and serving communities by providing innovative care for animals, finding loving homes and reuniting families.

Animals
7
Noco Humane

Our mission is to further the compassionate safe and responsible relationship between animals and people.

Animals
8
Dogs Unbroken

Dog Rescue Dogs Unbroken supports Colorado dogs at higher risk for euthanasia evaluating their behavioral stability and applying training methods appropriate for their needs. The goal of helping each dog learn to make good choices in…

Animals
9
Colorado Animal Rescue Inc

C.A.R.E's mission is practicing excellence in the animal care, education, and advocacy to connect pets to their people.

Animals
10
Black Ops Rescue

Transforming the lives of shelter pets and veterans through compassionate assessment, compatible adoptions, and ongoing support.

Animals
11
Open Sanctuary Project Inc

The Open Sanctuary Project is a freely accessible, always growing digital guide for any resources or information you need in order to responsibly create and successfully manage an animal sanctuary or to provide the best possible care to…

Animals
12
Environmental and Animal Defense

At Environmental and Animal Defense, our mission is to provide Colorado with access to affordable legal services for environmental and animal issues, in addition to protecting wildlife and their habitats through enforcement of the law. No…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Horse Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
19/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOULDER VALLEY: $10,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOULDER VALLEYSUMMIT COUNTY MOUNTAIN RESCUE: $8,000 · OtherSUMMIT COUNTY MOUNTAIN RESCUEMariposa: $6,000 · OtherMariposaHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,250 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCSUSAN KOMEN FOUNDATION: $4,000 · OtherSUSAN KOMEN FOUNDATIONBOULDER HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,000 · OtherBOULDER HUMANE SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherVolunteer Florida Foundation: $2,500 · Other+27 more: $26,740 · Other+27 moreATTENTION INC: $14,150 · Human ServicesATTENTION INCSMALL CHAMPIONS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSMALL CHAMPIONS INCMariposa DR Foundation: $3,000 · Human ServicesMariposa DR FoundationForward Steps Foundation: $2,450 · Human ServicesForward Steps FoundationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 · Human ServicesVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesBRIGHT FUTURES CONNECTIONS FOR SUCCESS: $1,500 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $1,500 · Human Services+2 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANIMAL…THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC: $5,500 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCI…LOLAS LUCKY DAY INC: $2,000 · AnimalsLOLAS LUCKY DAY…SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $1,500 · AnimalsSEA SHEPHERD CO…ROCKY MOUNTAIN HORSE RESCUE: $1,000 · Animals+2 more: $850 · AnimalsVOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $13,176 · Civil RightsVOICES FO…Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $8,900 · Recreation & SportsSUICIDE PREVENTION COALITION OF EAGLE VALLEY: $1,500 · HealthMiracles Therapeutic Riding Center: $500 · HealthAEROANGEL INC: $500 · HealthTEAM RUBICON INC: $2,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$71,990Human Services$36,600Animals$20,850Civil Rights$13,176Recreation & Sports$8,900Health$2,500Public Safety & Disaster$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATTENTION INC: $14,150 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $13,176 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMALL CHAMPIONS INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOULDER VALLEY: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBreckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $8,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,250 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetMariposa DR Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetForward Steps Foundation: $2,450 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLOLAS LUCKY DAY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARRY THE LOAD: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUICIDE PREVENTION COALITION OF EAGLE VALLEY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWilderness on Wheels: $1,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN HORSE RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER INC: $752 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA SOLDIERS CHILD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMiracles Therapeutic Riding Center: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALYSSA S ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATTENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds SMALL CHAMPIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOULDER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mariposa DR Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Forward Steps Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LOLAS LUCKY DAY INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Vail Valley Charitable Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES CONNECTIONS FOR SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CARRY THE LOAD ↗
  • Who funds SUICIDE PREVENTION COALITION OF EAGLE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Wilderness on Wheels ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN HORSE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO27.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Gr's Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward And Janet Ahlstrand Family Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward And Janet Ahlstrand Family Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edward And Janet Ahlstrand Family Found?

    Find your warmest path to Edward And Janet Ahlstrand Family Found through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward And Janet Ahlstrand Family Found’s filings →

    More from the funding graph