· Private foundation
Edith Winther Grace Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMP SUMMIT INC | $20,000 |
| TEXAS SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS | $15,000 |
| GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION | $10,000 |
| CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC | $10,000 |
| TEXAS AND SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE RAISERS | $10,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR THE YOUNG | $10,000 |
| ARTIST OUTREACH INC | $7,500 |
| PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT | $7,000 |
| ARLINGTON PREGNANCY CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| WINGS OF A BUTTERFLY | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS | $5,000 |
| ARLINGTON CHARITIES INC | $5,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS | $4,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCAMP SUMMIT INC5× · 2020–2025 · $94k · revenue +39%
- MIMAYFEST INC (DBA TRINITY COLLABORATIVE INC)4× · 2017–2021 · $73k · revenue +6%
- PBPrevent Blindness Texas3× · 2023–2025 · $43k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- UGUNION GOSPEL MISSION OFone grant, 2018 · $50k
- LFLeadership Fort Worthone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +8%
- CCCANCER CARE SERVICESone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…
The mission of the lighthouse for the blind of fort worth is to encourage and empower blind and significantly visually impaired children, youth, adults and seniors to achieve their highest level of independence through competitive…
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
Housing counseling services.
Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.
The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.
Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.
See Schedule OTDS fights for the end of mass incarceration and excessive punishment in Texas through direct representation, policy reform, and public education. TDS stands up for the dignity and humanity of people harmed by mass…
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.
VolunteerNow transforms lives through volunteers. As the hub of volunteerism in North Texas, and a national thought leader, VolunteerNow provides a wide range of programs and services to build capacity for nonprofit and community…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Essilor Vision Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAMP SUMMIT INC ↗
- Who funds MAYFEST INC (DBA TRINITY COLLABORATIVE INC) ↗
- Who funds ESSILOR VISION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Prevent Blindness Texas ↗
- Who funds Leadership Fort Worth ↗
- Who funds Artist Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION ↗
- Who funds CANCER CARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE SHAKEN BABY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NEW KEY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Wings of a Butterfly ↗
- Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
- Who funds Community Healthcare of Texas ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of North Texas ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Anna W Thornton & Alexander P Thornton · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Stein Family Charitable Trust · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Edith Winther Grace Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.