Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edgar P & Nona B McKinney Charitbale Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$409kReligion$88kHuman Services$87kHealth$50kYouth Development$8kPublic Benefit$5k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,250
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $18k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $12k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $12k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $10k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $10k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $6k → 10%SUNRISEARC INC: $5k → 10%SUNRISE ARC INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WI
NY
MA
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$607k · 27 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
10

Total granted

$607k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+47%

Still filing today

30%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Christian Care Center Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue +96%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $14k · revenue +44%
  • SI
    SUNRISEARC INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOUSE OF HOPE
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -47%
  • SU
    STETSON UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
7
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
10
Samuel Merritt University

Samuel merritt university educates students to become highly skilled and compassionate health care professionals who positively transform the experience of care in diverse communities.

Education
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
Nova Southeastern University Inc

The mission of Nova Southeastern University-a selective, doctoral research university-is to deliver academic programs in a dynamic, innovative environment. We foster academic excellence, leadership, integrity (continued on Schedule O) and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIBERTY COUNSEL INC: $87,500 · OtherLIBERTY COUNSEL INCUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL: $82,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLCHRISTIAN HOME AND BIBLE SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN HOME AND BIBLE SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $53,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $49,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDATHE ARC SUNRISE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $22,500 · OtherFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $22,250 · Other+22 more: $102,760 · Other+22 moreChristian Care Center Inc: $67,500 · Human ServicesChristian Car…SUNRISEARC INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISEARC IN…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $14,000 · EducationCUNY SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · EducationFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $4,500 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College: $3,750 · EducationSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC: $3,500 · EducationNew York University: $3,000 · EducationROLLINS COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationLAKE TECHNICAL COLLEGE INC: $2,000 · EducationGrace Medical Home Inc: $27,500 · HealthTHE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$495,260Human Services$77,500Education$40,750Health$27,500Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChristian Care Center Inc: $67,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetGrace Medical Home Inc: $27,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISEARC INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSCARC INC: $9,760 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCUNY SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROLLINS COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE TECHNICAL COLLEGE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Christian Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Grace Medical Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISEARC INC ↗
  • Who funds SCARC INC ↗
  • Who funds CUNY SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds STETSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ROLLINS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LAKE TECHNICAL COLLEGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr TaFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr Ta · Martin G Roxy & Eliz C Fdn Ta · Monar Fred B Helen Char Co-Ta · Williams M M & R P Fdn Ta · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edgar P & Nona B McKinney Charitbale Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edgar P & Nona B McKinney Charitbale Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Lake Technical College Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Stetson University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rollins College: 0% of income from government
  • Florida Southern College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edgar P & Nona B McKinney Charitbale’s filings →

More from the funding graph