· Private foundation
Martin G Roxy & Eliz C Fdn Ta
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $124k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRISTIAN HOME AND BIBLE SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $25,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER | $23,864 |
| LIBERTY COUNSEL INC | $20,000 |
| ARC SUNRISE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA | $10,000 |
| HAVEN OF LAKE & SUMTER COUNTY | $10,000 |
| FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NEW VISION FOR INDEPENDENCE INC | $5,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCChristian Care Center Inc5× · 2020–2025 · $109k · revenue +74%
- FPFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +152%
- NVNEW VISION FOR INDEPENDENCE INC3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- SISCARC INCone grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue -13%
- FFFind Feed & Restore Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +73%
- TATHE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVEone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering families with chidren to achieve permanent and stable self-sufficiency by providing case management; nutritious meals; and educational, health and career resources; in a safe and secure environment.
Habitat For Humanity is a Christian non-profit organization of hands-on professionals, volunteers, and future homeowners working together to renovate or build simple, decent, affordable housing and to ultimately make decent shelter a…
Pathways to care is dedicated to providing health, housing and hope to central floridas homeless.
The mission of the samaritan health and wellness center, inc. is to reclaim the healing ministry of jesus christ by providing affordable, professional primary health care and counseling for the working uninsured and under insured in lee…
Provide guardian and guardianship services to indigent and developmentally disabled citizens with no family or friends to make medical or financial decisions for them in citrus, hernando, lake, sumter and marion counties.
Faith based organization providing foster care recruitment, training, licensing, and support to its foster parents and families throughout Hillsborough County and the surrounding areas.
Provide social services including meals, clothing, household goods, temporary housing, referral services and facilitation for grants as designated payor for various clients.
The Organization's mission is to empower families in making their transition from homelessness to sustainable independence.
The Organization works to permanently break the cycle of homelessness by providing homeless women with children safe shelter, onsite childcare, access to mental health counseling, access to health care, transportation, education,…
The corporation is organized for the purpose of permanently reducing the number of homeless individuals and families in the central florida region.
To develop, manage and operate the First Step Shelter Program, a homeless assistance service program and shelter in Volusia County, Florida.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Care Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Christian Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds NEW VISION FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Cornerstone Hospice Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds SCARC INC ↗
- Who funds Find Feed & Restore Inc ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mount Dora Community Trust · Barry C Warren Fdn Ta · Dorothy B C Steves Char Ta · Williams M M & R P Fdn Ta · Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr Ta · Monar Fred B Helen Char Co-Ta · Edgar P & Nona B McKinney Charitbale Trust · Hunter Matthew & Mildred Char Ta · United Way of Lake and Sumter Counties Inc · Harper Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Parker Irma & Orville Ch Tr Ta · Dr Harry J Heeb Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Martin G Roxy & Eliz C Fdn Ta funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Martin G Roxy & Eliz C Fdn Ta?
Find your warmest path to Martin G Roxy & Eliz C Fdn Ta through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.