· Private foundation
Ed Uihlein Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k44 grants · $130k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $468k
- $50k–250k21 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+7 grants · $5.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE JACK MILLER CENTER | $1,000,000 |
| MAX MCGRAW WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| COMMUNIO | $1,000,000 |
| CHOKOLOSKEE CHURCH OF GOD | $697,117 |
| DELTA WATERFOWL FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SPECIAL DEPOSITORY | $500,000 |
| ASHBROOK CENTER | $300,000 |
| ST ANASTASIA | $200,000 |
| JIM RYUN MINISTRIES | $200,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH | $150,000 |
| DUCKS UNLIMITED | $150,000 |
| FELLOW MORTALS | $150,000 |
| HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION | $130,000 |
| BALLOTPEDIA | $100,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.
103 repeat relationships — 98 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $780k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCOMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +161%
- MMMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +30%
- DUDucks Unlimited Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +12%
Funded once
- ACAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +42%
- PFPRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF LAKE COUNTYone grant, 2022 · $500k
NORTHSHORE CLASSICAL ACADEMYone grant, 2023 · $400k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.
To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.
Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The American Conservative and the most unlike its peers is Carson Springs Wildlife Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds JIM RYUN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH ↗
- Who funds NORTHSHORE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOW MORTALS INC ↗
- Who funds LUCY BURNS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KENOSHA INC ↗
- Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Inner City Impact ↗
- Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NITTANY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Carson Springs Wildlife Foundation ↗
- Who funds CLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN ↗
- Who funds GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Becket Fund ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY ↗
- Who funds Envision Unlimited ↗
- Who funds THE AVALON NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds THE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Triad Foundation Inc · Charles Koch Institute · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · The Armstrong Foundation · The Buchanan Family Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · Charles Koch Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ed Uihlein Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ed Uihlein Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Ed Uihlein Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.