Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Eastland County Open Door

The Open Door provides assistance to women struggling with unplanned pregnancies or under financial strain.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Civil Rights$142kInternational$107kHealth$69kHuman Services$10kReligion$6k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $81k
$14,175
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$26,775
SUSAN B ANTHONY EDUCATION FUND$14,175
HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL$14,175
PASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES$14,175
TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK$11,236
COLEMAN CARES PREGNANCY$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUMAN COALITION: $10k → 5%TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK: $12k → 10%CREATED WITH PURPOSE: $7k → 14%TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK: $11k → 10%TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK: $11k → 10%TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK: $9k → 11%TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$309k · 6 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$309k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+164%

Still filing today

83%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $81k · revenue +40%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    6× · 2018–2024 · $77k · revenue +117%
  • TP
    TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK
    6× · 2019–2024 · $59k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • HC
    HUMAN COALITIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +164%
  • CW
    CREATED WITH PURPOSE OF WEST TEXAS
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue -12%
  • GE
    GLOBAL EVANGELISM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Coalition for Life

Houston coalition for life aims to end abortion in houston, peacefully and prayerfully.

Health
2
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

3
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
4
Life Matters Worldwide

Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.

Civil Rights
5
Life Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

Pregnancy resource center (prc) exists to prevent abortions and provide eternal truth through evidence based medical services and the gospel of jesus christ.

Health
6
Texas Right to Life Committee Inc

To educate & inform the public about abortion, euthanasia, infanticide and other issues involving human life from conception to natural death and promote legal protection of human life from conception to natural death through passage of…

7
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
8
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

9
Life Choices Pregnancy Center Inc

We are an outreach ministry of jesus christ committed to providing compassionate guidance, education, and help for all involved prior to, during, and following an unplanned pregnancy.

Health
10
Education for Life Inc

The Womens Pregnancy Center is a Christ-centered ministry designed to engage and inform women in unplanned pregnancies, empowering them to make life-affirming decisions.

Health
11
Pregnancy Care Centers Dba Network of Life

The organization strives to empower those most vulnerable to abortion to choose life by offering free medical interventions and support services to those facing an unintended pregnancy. it serves the community with a robust wellness…

Health
12
Life-Way Family and Pregnancy Suppo

The organization provides women in crisis pregnancies alternatives to abortion, regardless of their religion, race or position in life and to help them come to a decision they and their babies can live the rest of their lives.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Pregnancy Care Network and the most unlike its peers is Alliance Defending Freedom. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $76,687 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOMTEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $39,685 · Civil RightsTEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE EDUCATIONAL FUNDSusan B Anthony List Education Fund — $25,900 · Civil RightsSusan B Anthony List Education FundHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC — $81,458 · OtherHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INCGLOBAL EVANGELISM INC — $6,380 · OtherGLOBAL EVANGELISM INC+1 more — $2,500 · OtherTEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK — $59,374 · Human ServicesTEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETW…HUMAN COALITION — $10,480 · Human ServicesHUMAN COALITIONCREATED WITH PURPOSE OF WEST TEXAS — $7,100 · Human ServicesCREATED WITH PURPOSE OF W…PASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC — $25,900 · Religion
Civil Rights$142,272Other$90,338Human Services$76,954Religion$25,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC — $81,458 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $76,687 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK — $59,374 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $39,685 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Education Fund — $25,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCREATED WITH PURPOSE OF WEST TEXAS — $7,100 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eastland County Open Door funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eastland County Open Door?

    Find your warmest path to Eastland County Open Door through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph