Loading…
· Public charity
EASTLAND COUNTY OPEN DOOR
The Open Door provides assistance to women struggling with unplanned pregnancies or under financial strain.
$83k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
5
Communities
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Civil Rights$142kHuman Services$77kReligion$26kOther$90k
02FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $3k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $81k
$14,175
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
- ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$26,775
- PASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES$14,175
- SUSAN B ANTHONY EDUCATION FUND$14,175
- HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL$14,175
- TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK$11,236
- COLEMAN CARES PREGNANCY$2,500
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$309k · 6 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
3
Total granted
$309k
$24k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+117%
+142%
Still filing today
83%
67%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesCivil RightsReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HIHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL6× · 2019–2024 · $81k · revenue +107%
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM6× · 2018–2024 · $77k · revenue +117%- TPTEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK6× · 2019–2024 · $59k · revenue +382%
Funded once
- HCHUMAN COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +142%
- CWCREATED WITH PURPOSEone grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue -12%
- SOSANCTUARY OF HOPEone grant, 2019 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Greater Fort Worth Pro-Life Ministries
Provide care in a safe and confidential environment for women and men facing unplanned pregnancies
Education
2
Texas Right to Life Committee Inc
To educate & inform the public about abortion, euthanasia, infanticide and other issues involving human life from conception to natural death and promote legal protection of human life from conception to natural death through passage of…
—
3
Americans United for Life Inc
AUL is an organization that advances the human right to life in culture, law, and policy.
Civil Rights
4
Houston Coalition for Life
Houston coalition for life aims to end abortion in houston peacefully and prayerfully. programs include education, outreach, activism and the operation of mobile crisis pregnancy centers.
Health
5
Life Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
Pregnancy resource center exists to prevent abortions and present eternal truth.
Health
6
A Choice for Life Inc
To provide support and hope through the gospel of jesus christ to those affected by unplanned pregnancies, walking beside them for life.
—
7
Texas Alliance for Life Inc
Protect innocent human life through promoting public policies.
—
8
Life Advancement Group
To rescue lives from the destruction of abortion through innovative marketing, strategy, and technology solutions.
—
9
Life Choices Pregnancy Center Inc
Protect the lives of the unborn
Health
10
Life Matters Worldwide
Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.
Civil Rights
11
The Human Choice of Iowa
Provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education.
Human Services
12
Life Choice Center
To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Pregnancy Care Network and the most unlike its peers is Alliance Defending Freedom. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Civil Rights$142,272Other$90,338Human Services$76,954Religion$25,900
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Father's Table FoundationOH13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Father's Table Foundation · Strake Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation EASTLAND COUNTY OPEN DOOR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CREATED WITH PURPOSE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~13 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 833926090 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CREATED WITH PURPOSE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 13 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Eastland County Open Door?
Find your warmest path to Eastland County Open Door through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines