Skip to content

· Public charity

East Central Regional Arts Council

The EAST CENTRAL REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL's purpose is to promote and encourage all of the arts in east central minnesota.

$482k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.2MRecreation & Sports$125kHealth$14kHuman Services$13k
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $402,959, the rows itemized in this filing. The $481,923 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $78,964 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$15,734
Median grant
1
States reached
$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WYOMING AREA CREATIVE ARTS COMMUNITY$60,132
FRANCONIA SCULPTURE PARK$29,600
PINE CITY ARTS COUNCIL$21,675
UNEXPECTED COMPANY CHORALE$21,150
CITY OF LINDSTROM$20,000
KANABEC COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY$20,000
NORTH BRANCH PUBLIC SCHOOLS$20,000
MILLE LACS COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY$19,134
EAST CENTRAL MINNESOTA PRIDE$17,200
CITY OF HINCKLEY$16,500
CITY OF NORTH BRANCH$16,310
MILACA RECFEST & ACTIVITIES$15,734
PINE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$15,600
CITY OF MORA$13,659
KANABEC COUNTY EXTENSION SERVICE$11,341
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ECUMEN PARMLY LIFEPOINTS: $8k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 29 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
13

Total granted

$2.1M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+11%

Still filing today

48%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WYOMING AREA CREATIVE ARTS COMMUNITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $243k · revenue +7% · 54% of their budget
  • ML
    Mille Lacs County Agricultural Society
    9× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +104%
  • PC
    PINE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $79k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • NW
    NORTH WOODS AND WATERS OF THE ST CROIX HERITAGE AREA
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0% · 59% of their budget
  • EC
    EAST CENTRAL MN EDUCATIONAL CABLE C
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • CO
    CITY OF PINE CITY
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paramount Center for the Arts

To engage, educate, enrich, and entertain through inspiring arts experiences. the city-owned facility is managed to ensure use by a diverse set of patrons, enhance artistic opportunity, provide a creative environment for community…

Human Services
2
Mankato Area Arts Council

The mission of the Mankato Area Arts Council, DBA Carnegie Art Center, is to be a vibrant community destination that inspires, nurtures, and expands artistic, cultural, and educational experiences.

—
3
Red Wing Arts Association

Our mission is to build a vibrant community fueled by the arts. We enrich lives by connecting, celebrating, inspiring, and leading through shared art experiences. Our vision is a community alive with creativity.

Arts & Culture
4
Pipestone Performing Arts Center

Provide a theatre of live music and events!

Arts & Culture
5
Northwest Minnesota Arts Council

Support and enhance the development of the arts in northwestern minnesota. facilitate and encourage the creation and appreciation of the arts.

Arts & Culture
6
Pearson Lakes Art Center

The Organization's mission is to excite, engage and serve communities within the Iowa Great Lakes Region through our collections, exhibitions, performances, and educational programs; a non-profit center connecting generations of people…

Arts & Culture
7
Aitkin County Friends of the Arts

Dedicated to nurturing, encouraging, and supporting arts in aitkin county mn.

—
8
Jackson Center for the Arts

Community center that provides art exper

Arts & Culture
9
North Country Museum of Arts Inc dba Nemeth Art Center

The Nemeth Art Center is a 501(c)3 non-profit arts organization and gallery space located in rural northern Minnesota. Open in the summer months, the NAC exhibits contemporary art from emerging and recognized artists and is particularly…

—
10
Three Lakes Center for the Arts in the Northwoods Inc

To promote the arts to educate, entertain, and enlighten in northern WI.

Arts & Culture
11
River Arts Alliance

River Arts Alliance supports and celebrates regional arts and culture by connecting artists and community in the Winona, MN region.

Arts & Culture
12
Lake Benton Opera House Inc

The Lake Benton Opera House, one of the premiere historic buildings in southwest Minnesota. Home to an active community theatre, the Opera House has begun its second century in our community.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 210 Gallery and Art Center Colleen Shati; the most unlike its peers is Ecumen Sbc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Walker Methodist Foundation: $114,396 · OtherWalker Methodist FoundationCHISAGO LAKES COMMUNITY EDUCATION: $103,600 · OtherCHISAGO LAKES COMMUNITY EDUCATIONCITY OF HINCKLEY: $90,965 · OtherCITY OF HINCKLEYCITY OF NORTH BRANCH: $87,107 · OtherCITY OF NORTH BRANCHCITY OF MORA: $86,580 · OtherCITY OF MORAPINE CITY ARTS COUNCIL: $71,898 · OtherPINE CITY ARTS COUNCILEAST CENTRAL MINNESOTA PRIDE: $57,555 · OtherPlay Inc Arts: $40,800 · Other+29 more: $452,893 · Other+29 moreFRANCONIA SCULPTURE PARK LEGEROS: $430,487 · Arts & CultureFRANCONIA SCULPTURE PARK LEGEROSWYOMING AREA CREATIVE ARTS COMMUNITY: $243,052 · Arts & CultureWYOMING AREA CREATIVE ARTS COMMUNITYUNEXPECTED COMPANY CHORALE: $86,699 · Arts & CultureUNEXPECTED COMPANY CHORALEPINE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $46,800 · Arts & CulturePINE CENTER FOR THE ARTS+2 more: $30,740 · Arts & CultureMille Lacs County Agricultural Society: $144,344 · Recreation & SportsMille Lacs …ONE HEARTLAND: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsONE HEARTLA…210 GALLERY AND ART CENTER COLLEEN SHATI: $45,200 · Recreation & Sports210 GALLERY…PINE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $79,300 · Food & NutritionVASALOPPET INC: $75,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $31,341 · EducationNORTH WOODS AND WATERS OF THE ST CROIX HERITAGE AREA: $20,000 · Environment
Other$1,105,794Arts & Culture$837,778Recreation & Sports$239,544Food & Nutrition$79,300Philanthropy$75,000Education$31,341Environment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRANCONIA SCULPTURE PARK LEGEROS: $430,487 over 9y, 13% of budgetWYOMING AREA CREATIVE ARTS COMMUNITY: $243,052 over 9y, 54% of budgetMille Lacs County Agricultural Society: $144,344 over 9y, 7.8% of budgetWalker Methodist Foundation: $114,396 over 5y, 16% of budgetUNEXPECTED COMPANY CHORALE: $86,699 over 5y, 42% of budgetPINE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $79,300 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetVASALOPPET INC: $75,000 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetONE HEARTLAND: $50,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetPINE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $46,800 over 6y, 15% of budget210 GALLERY AND ART CENTER COLLEEN SHATI: $45,200 over 3y, 28% of budgetPlay Inc Arts: $40,800 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $31,341 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKES & PINES COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $21,703 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARADISE COMMUNITY THEATRE ASSN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetNORTH WOODS AND WATERS OF THE ST CROIX HERITAGE AREA: $20,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetTUSEN TACK: $15,800 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $13,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetELIM HOMES INC: $13,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR PAWS CULTURAL ART: $10,740 over 1y, 18% of budgetCHISAGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,704 over 1y, 7.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRANCONIA SCULPTURE PARK LEGEROS ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING AREA CREATIVE ARTS COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds Mille Lacs County Agricultural Society ↗
  • Who funds Walker Methodist Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNEXPECTED COMPANY CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds PINE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds VASALOPPET INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds PINE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds 210 GALLERY AND ART CENTER COLLEEN SHATI ↗
  • Who funds Play Inc Arts ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAKES & PINES COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds PARADISE COMMUNITY THEATRE ASSN INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH WOODS AND WATERS OF THE ST CROIX HERITAGE AREA ↗
  • Who funds TUSEN TACK ↗
  • Who funds ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ELIM HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAR PAWS CULTURAL ART ↗
  • Who funds CHISAGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Initiative FoundationMN29.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Initiative Foundation · St Croix Valley Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · C K Blandin Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization East Central Regional Arts Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from East Central Regional Arts Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to East Central Regional Arts Council?

    Find your warmest path to East Central Regional Arts Council through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on East Central Regional Arts Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph