· Private foundation
Earthsense Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $175k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DENVER FILM SOCIETY | $75,000 |
| YELLOW DOT STUDIOS INC | $75,000 |
| MISSION BLUE | $50,000 |
| ONLY ONE | $42,000 |
| CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND | $25,000 |
| CAMBODIAN CHILDRENS FUND | $25,000 |
| MUSIC HEALS INTERNATIONAL | $16,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| WILD AFRICA | $12,000 |
| SWEETWATER MUSIC HALL | $10,000 |
| STAND EARTH | $10,000 |
| THE REDFORD CENTER | $10,000 |
| MOONJELLY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SAN FRANSISCO | $8,500 |
| THE NEW YORK WOMENS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of Earthsense Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 41% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 36% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +137% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND6× · 2019–2024 · $510k · revenue +137%
- UFUTAH FILM CENTER4× · 2020–2023 · $265k · revenue +121%
- TFTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC3× · 2019–2023 · $185k · revenue +201%
Funded once
- WMWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +12%
- TFTED FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +31%
- IFINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INCone grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Save threatened marine life using pioneering research, education, and sustainable conservation solutions
Reel Earth Films promotes wildlife conservation by creating films that nurture the human connection to nature, spread awareness about life-threatening challenges facing species worldwide, and advance environmental activism and research.
To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…
Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…
To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Only One Inc and the most unlike its peers is Flying Elephants Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FLYING ELEPHANTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Sylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue ↗
- Who funds REDFORD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ONE OCEAN MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YELLOW DOT STUDIOS INC ↗
- Who funds OO PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Cambodian Childrens Fund ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
- Who funds ONLY ONE INC ↗
- Who funds WILDAID INC ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC HEALS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds TED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Sundance Institute ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Oceanic Preservation Society ↗
- Who funds OCEANELDERS INC ↗
- Who funds SWEETWATER MUSIC HALL INC ↗
- Who funds International FIRST Committee Associatio co Toohey Law Group ↗
- Who funds HOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Spero Worldwide ↗
- Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR ACCOUNTABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds Future Brilliance US Inc ↗
- Who funds For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) ↗
- Who funds Moonjelly Foundation ↗
- Who funds STAND ↗
- Who funds Rainforest Action Network ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Code Blue Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Seattle Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Marin Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Earthsense Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Earthsense Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Earthsense Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.