Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Code Blue Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$664k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$2.5MArts & Culture$731kAnimals$66kEducation$60kHealth$44kCivil Rights$40kCommunity Improvement$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $365k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODS HOLE INSTITUTE$150,000
UTAH FILM CENTER$75,000
INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION$70,000
SYLVIA EARLE ALLIANCE$70,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC$25,000
EARTH RESTORATION ALLIANCE (GLOBAL CHOICES)$25,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$25,000
OUTLAW OCEAN PROJECT$25,000
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND$25,000
MARGARETVILLE HOSPITAL$20,000
REDFORD CENTER$20,000
WOODSTOCK FILM FESTIVAL$20,000
REDFORD CENTER$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZEITZ MOCAA FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
OR
WY
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 36 repeat orgs$766k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
46

Total granted

$2.8M
$535k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+24%

Still filing today

89%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $231k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsScience & TechEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    Sylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue
    8× · 2017–2024 · $384k · revenue +290%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $242k · revenue +274%
  • RC
    REDFORD CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • TP
    The Pachamama Alliance
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -4%
  • YD
    YELLOW DOT STUDIOS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • TO
    THE OUTLAW OCEANS PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
2
Oikonos - Ecosystem Knowledge

Oikonos studies and protects imperiled ecosystems by engaging diverse communities through innovative scientific and artistic collaborations.

Science & Tech
3
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
4
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
5
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
6
Reel Earth Films

Reel Earth Films promotes wildlife conservation by creating films that nurture the human connection to nature, spread awareness about life-threatening challenges facing species worldwide, and advance environmental activism and research.

Arts & Culture
7
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
8
Marine Megafauna Foundation

Save threatened marine life using pioneering research, education, and sustainable conservation solutions

International
9
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
10
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
11
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
12
Wildlife Conservation Global Inc

Wildlife conservation global, inc. operates the okapi conservation project (ocp) which works in the democratic republic of the congo with the institute in congo for the conservation of nature (iccn) and local communities throughout the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mark Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…Community Arts CentersCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/64
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,501

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/60
Grantees still filing
46/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INC — $241,650 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INCREDFORD CENTER INC — $235,000 · EnvironmentREDFORD CENTER INCINTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $210,000 · EnvironmentINTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATI…LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $105,000 · EnvironmentLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FU…Project Regeneration — $100,000 · EnvironmentProject RegenerationOO PROJECT — $85,000 · EnvironmentOO PROJECTOceanic Preservation Society — $75,000 · EnvironmentOceanic Preservation SocietyWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $55,000 · EnvironmentThe Pachamama Alliance — $50,000 · Environment+11 more — $182,250 · Environment+11 moreWOODS HOLE INSTITUTE — $150,000 · OtherWOODS HOLE INSTITUTEINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS…SEACOLOGY — $60,000 · OtherSEACOLOGYTHE OUTLAW OCEANS PROJECT — $50,000 · OtherTHE OUTLAW OCEANS PROJEC…MARGARETVILLE HOSPITAL — $40,000 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherFUDR — $36,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $35,000 · Other+37 more — $274,383 · Other+37 moreUTAH FILM CENTER — $150,000 · Arts & CultureUTAH FILM CENTERSundance Institute — $98,000 · Arts & CultureSundance Institut…THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $95,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILM COLLABOR…WOODSTOCK FILM FESTIVAL INC — $70,000 · Arts & CultureWOODSTOCK FILM FE…YELLOW DOT STUDIOS INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureYELLOW DOT STUDIO…INDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC — $35,000 · Arts & CultureINDEPENDENT FEATU…WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $36,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreNATIONAL AQUARIUM INC — $170,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL AQUA…TROUT UNLIMITED INC — $90,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMIT…BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $60,000 · AnimalsBIG LIFE FOUN…BENEATH THE WAVES INC — $51,500 · AnimalsBENEATH THE W…WILD SALMON CENTER — $35,000 · AnimalsWILD SALMON C…WILDAID INC — $16,000 · Animals+1 more — $2,500 · AnimalsSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue — $383,600 · Science & TechSylvia Earle…+2 more — $11,000 · Science & TechNew York University — $50,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION — $10,010 · EducationVIRGIN UNITE USA INC — $18,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $12,500 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Environment$1,338,900Other$785,633Arts & Culture$559,000Animals$425,000Science & Tech$394,600Education$60,010Philanthropy$35,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue — $383,600 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INC — $241,650 over 7y, 17% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC — $235,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $210,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL AQUARIUM INC — $170,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER — $150,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $105,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetProject Regeneration — $100,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetSundance Institute — $98,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $95,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOO PROJECT — $85,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetOceanic Preservation Society — $75,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetWOODSTOCK FILM FESTIVAL INC — $70,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSEACOLOGY — $60,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $60,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBENEATH THE WAVES INC — $51,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYELLOW DOT STUDIOS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNew York University — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION PHOTOGRAPHERS — $42,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND — $35,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER — $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetONE OCEAN MEDIA FOUNDATION — $27,500 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCalifornia Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance — $25,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetWILDAID INC — $16,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHANCOCK FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $12,500 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEODORE GORDON FLYFISHERS INC — $10,600 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetHOT DOCS FOUNDATION USA INC — $10,500 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION — $10,010 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCity Kids to Wilderness Project Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOCEANELDERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTOCKADE WORKS INC — $5,150 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CARL SAFINA CENTER INC THE SAFINA CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR ACCOUNTABILITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN AWARENESS PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Earthsense FoundationThe Keith Campbell Fo…Pledgeling FoundationThe Marisla FoundationPatagoniaorgHumphreys Family Foun…A Lindsay & Olive B O…Silicon Valley Commun…Marin Community Found…Resources Legacy FundThe Schmidt Family Fo…The Pew Charitable Tr…
Earthsense FoundationNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Earthsense Foundation · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Pledgeling Foundation · The Marisla Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Humphreys Family Foundation of Scottsdale · A Lindsay & Olive B O'Connor Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · The Schmidt Family Foundation · The Pew Charitable Trusts

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Code Blue Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
  • National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Code Blue Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Code Blue Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines