How much did EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER grant in FY2024?

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER reported 12 grants totaling $712,992 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER based?

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER is based in OH.

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER

The Early Childhood Resource Center (ECRC) is a ministry of the Sisters of Charity of St.

$713k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$82k

Largest

01What you fund

0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$1.3MYouth Development$185kHealth$178kOther$512k

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k9 grants · $204k
$50k–250k2 grants · $146k

$24,807

Median grant

States reached

$4.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

Family Connection of Northeast Ohio$81,736
YMCA of Central Ohio$64,562
Home for Families$34,666
Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority$34,348
Best Point Education and Behavioral Health$25,125
Early Childhood Education Alliance Inc$24,807
Action for Children$23,853
Nationwide Childrens Hospital$22,899
Wellspring$13,358
Fairless Local Schools$13,040
New Miami School District$12,085
AHEAD Inc$5,088

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 95% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.1M · 13 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.1M

$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+42%

Still filing today

77%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FC
Family Connection of Northeast Ohio
4× · 2021–2024 · $456k · revenue +18%
YO
YMCA of Central Ohio
4× · 2021–2024 · $242k · revenue +22%
HF
Homeless Families Foundation
4× · 2021–2024 · $189k · revenue +243%

Funded once

FR
Future Ready Columbusgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $38k · revenue +591%
GF
Greenleaf Family Centergraduated
one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +42%
CC
Cuyahoga County Invest in Children
one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ohio Children's Alliance

The Ohio Children's Alliance applies the collective strength of its members to sustainably improve the provision of services to children, young adults and families through policy advocacy, performance improvement and member support.

—

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education

Pathways Counseling Center Inc

Community Mental Health, Drug Abuse and Alcoholism Services.

Education

Community Coordinated Child Care Inc

To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care & education through integrated support & expertise.

Human Services

Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier children's mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—

Families Flourish Inc

Families Flourish was created to give Central Ohio children a chance to live in our region's higher-resourced neighborhoods. The goal of the organization is to improve academic performance for children, financial well-being and physical…

Human Services

Childrens Action Alliance Inc

Childrens Action Alliance is an independent voice that identifies and eliminates barriers to the well-being of children and families and creates opportunities through partnerships and policy solutions.

—

Ohio Child Care Resource and Referral

Occrra enhances the statewide system of child and youth learning and development experiences to achieve high quality outcomes for ohio children and families. we accomplish our mission by, supporting ohio's network of child care resource &…

—

Community Child Care Coordinating

4Cs exists to develop and coordinate resources to strengthen families and children. We provide high quality programs that have a large and lasting effect on the child's education, foundation, well-being, and a family's ability to become…

Human Services

Child Development and Family Council of

Assist qualifying families in obtaining quality child care in the centre county, pa area.

Human Services

Child Care Connections of Cleveland County Inc

Creating a link between parents, providers, and the community to improve the availability, accessibility and affordability of quality child care.

Education

Community Connections for Children Inc

Community connections for children, inc ensures that all families have access to affordable, high quality child care choices that lead to success in school and life.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Connections of Northeast Ohio and the most unlike its peers is The Homeless Families Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

13/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$1,304,935Other$511,895Youth Development$184,990Health$177,654

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Coalition on Homelessness And · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Nationwide Childrens Hospital.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~14 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 311036372 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Nationwide Childrens Hospital, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 36% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Early Childhood Resource Center?

Find your warmest path to Early Childhood Resource Center through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Early Childhood Resource Center?

More from the funding graph

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Early Childhood Resource Center?

More from the funding graph