Skip to content
Eagle's Wing Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Eagle's Wing Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$650kAnimals$610kPhilanthropy$600kPublic Safety & Disaster$450kEducation$385kCommunity Improvement$360kInternational$170kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$1,000,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jabil Cares Foundation Inc$1,000,000
Operation Light Shine$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $490k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Innocence Project: $40k → 17%American Red Cross: $250k → 14%American Red Cross: $100k → 14%American Red Cross: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
NY
CT
CA
MD
AR
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 11 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$2.3M
$808k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+38%

Still filing today

82%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2017–2019 · $450k · revenue +46%
  • YW
    YELLOWSTONE WILDLIFE SANCTUARY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $400k · revenue +31% · 33% of their budget
  • OL
    OPERATION LIGHT SHINE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $360k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • RL
    Red Lodge School District
    one grant, 2021 · $385k
  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue +20%
  • YB
    Yellow Bird Life Center
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
2
Border Horse Slaughter Rescue

Prevent cruelty to animals.

Animals
3
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
4
A Better Chance International Rescue
—
5
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
6
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
7
War Angel Farms Rescue and Rehabilitation Inc
Animals
8
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
9
Born Free Foundation
—
10
Blue Horse Sanctuary
Animals
11
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
12
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Castleton Ranch Horse Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jabil Cares Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JABIL CARES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyJABIL CARES FOUNDATION INCRED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $600,000 · PhilanthropyRED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $50,000 · PhilanthropyRed Lodge School District: $385,000 · OtherRed Lodge School DistrictOPERATION LIGHT SHINE: $360,000 · OtherOPERATION LIGHT SHINEHeifer International: $170,000 · OtherHeifer InternationalBoys and Girls Club: $100,000 · OtherBoys and Girls ClubSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $75,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHYellow Bird Life Center: $50,000 · OtherThe Innocent Project: $50,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF MT DORA: $50,000 · Other+6 more: $133,000 · Other+6 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $450,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCEN…YELLOWSTONE WILDLIFE SANCTUARY: $400,000 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTO…BRIAN BILL FOUNDATION INC: $355,000 · InternationalTREVOR PROJECT INC: $265,000 · Civil RightsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · AnimalsBEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE: $70,000 · AnimalsMilly S Place: $20,000 · AnimalsMalinois and Dutch Shepherd Rescue Inc: $10,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$1,650,000Other$1,373,000Human Services$490,000Environment$400,000International$355,000Civil Rights$265,000Animals$180,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJABIL CARES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetRED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $450,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE WILDLIFE SANCTUARY: $400,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetOPERATION LIGHT SHINE: $360,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetBRIAN BILL FOUNDATION INC: $355,000 over 6y, 31% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $265,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE: $70,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetTask Force Dagger Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMilly S Place: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMalinois and Dutch Shepherd Rescue Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eagle's Wing Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eagle's Wing Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eagle's Wing Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Eagle's Wing Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eagle's Wing’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home