Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
13
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2024
8%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$400,000
Organizations funded a year
12 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$37M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 8% of the organizations E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving12$1.8M0%
FY202412$1.6M8%
FY202313$1.9M8%
FY202213$1.8M15%
FY202112$1.6M0%
FY202013$1.6M0%
FY201913$1.7M23%
FY201812$1.4Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$5.0MHealth$3.6MScience & Tech$2.6MEmployment$1.6MHousing & Shelter$1.3MArts & Culture$475kFood & Nutrition$450kCommunity Improvement$200k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($5.3M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Rockefeller University: $1,850,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJohns Hopkins University: $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Hearing and Communication: $900,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetPer Scholas Inc: $800,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMassachusetts Housing Investment Corporation: $725,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCold Spring Harbor Laboratory: $650,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNontraditional Employment for Women: $650,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetCrossroads Community Services Inc: $450,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetNeighborhood Coalition for Shelter Inc: $250,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $220,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHilltown Community Development Corporation: $200,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetMarcy Lab Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAssociation of Community Employment: $150,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 with peer funders

About E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006

How much does E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 give?
E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 reported 13 grants totaling $2,075,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (33%), Health (24%), Science & Tech (17%).
Who are E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: The Rockefeller University ($1.9M), Johns Hopkins University ($1.0M), Center for Hearing and Communication ($900k).
Does E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Hyde and Watson Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 based?
E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006 is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on E Schwartz Charitable Foundation Xxxxx7006’s filings →

More from the funding graph