· Private foundation
E & H Humbly Bumbly Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5TH AVE THEATER | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| ACLU OF WASHINGTON STATE | $4,000 |
| UNIVERSITY FOOD BANK | $4,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $4,000 |
| WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST | $3,000 |
| IDAHO MIGRATION ALLIANCE | $3,000 |
| KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO | $3,000 |
| CREW NETWORK | $3,000 |
| THE COMMUNITY LIBRARY | $2,000 |
| ROOSEVELT HIGH SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| PURRFECT PALS | $2,000 |
| COCOON HOUSE | $2,000 |
| NORTHWEST HARVEST | $2,000 |
| WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT | $1,608 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 100% of E & H Humbly Bumbly Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 0%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
20 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- WRWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +80%
- WWWESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECTS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +55%
- WWWILDERNESS WATCH INC6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $5k
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN WASHINGTONone grant, 2020 · $5k
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN WASHIone grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…
Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.
Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.
Coquille watershed association (coqwa) works collaboratively with communities and landowners to develop and implement voluntary watershed restoration, enhancement, and community engagement activities that promote healthy and resilient…
Western Resource Advocates (WRA) is a regional nonprofit advocacy organization fighting climate change and its impacts to sustain the environment, economy, and people of the West. As the region's go-to experts for more than three decades,…
Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…
Work through advocacy and education to use federal environmental laws such as the Clean Water Act to protect and restore water quality and habit in the Pacific Northwest and nationwide.
Founded in 1981, the wetlands conservancy is dedicated to working in partnership with communities statewide to permanently protect, conserve and restore oregon's greatest wetlands.
To sustain and improve the hood river watershed through education, cooperaton, and stewardship, and work collaboratively with local governments, agencies, tribal nations, community groups and landowners. (see schedule o for full statement)
The center for whale research (cwr) is dedicated to the study and conservation of the pacific northwests killer whale populations, with a primary focus on the critically endangered southern resident killer whales. building on half a…
Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…
Providing legal aid to the environment by providing legal services to conservation organizations, community groups, native american tribes, and individuals working to protect and sustain the pacific northwest's natural legacy.
How this is measured
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
- Who funds WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds WILDERNESS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds COCOON HOUSE ↗
- Who funds PURRFECT PALS ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds Commercial Real Estate Women Network ↗
- Who funds ORCA RELIEF CITIZENS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds TILTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PCC FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds MASTER GARDENER FOUNDATION OF KING COUNTY ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization E & H Humbly Bumbly Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E & H Humbly Bumbly Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on E & H Humbly Bumbly’s filings →