Skip to content
Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo at a glance

· Private foundation

Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2022
87
Grants FY2022
23
States reached
$200
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Animals$49kEnvironment$1kPublic Benefit$650
02FY2022 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150
Median grant
23
States reached
$207k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE-A-SATO INC$200
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$150
PROJECT K9 HERO$150
UNITED FOR A CAUSE$150
PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS$150
LAST CHANCE FOR ANIMALS$150
GREEN PEACE$150
600 MILLION STRAY DOGS$150
FOUR CORNERS EQUINE RESCUE$150
PHYSICIANS COMM FOR RESPONSIBLE MED$150
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$150
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$150
INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS F$150
NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC$150
CASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $650) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORPHAN ACRES: $150 → 16%ORPHAN ACRES: $150 → 16%ORPHAN ACRES: $100 → 16%ORPHAN ACRES: $100 → 16%ORPHAN ACRES: $75 → 16%ORPHAN ACRES: $75 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51k · 87 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

87 repeat relationships: 87 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

87
0

Total granted

$51k
$0

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BROWNIE BLONDIE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $3k · revenue +28%
  • SC
    SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $950 · revenue +6%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $700 · revenue +80%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Global Animal Partnership
    Animals
    2
    Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

    Animal Welfare

    —
    3
    Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
    Animals
    4
    Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

    To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

    Animals
    5
    Animal Wellness Action

    To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

    Human Services
    6
    World Animal Protection

    World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

    Animals
    7
    The Animal Rescue League
    Animals
    8
    Wolfe Ranch Rescue
    Animals
    9
    J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

    Animal care and rescue

    Animals
    10
    The Animal Welfare Foundation
    —
    11
    A Better Chance International Rescue
    —
    12
    Runaways Animal Rescue
    Animals
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Chance Animal Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    13
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    48/51
    Grantees still filing
    44/51
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BROWNIE BLONDIE FOUNDATION INC: $3,362 · AnimalsBROWNIE BLONDIE FOUNDATION INCSAVE A SATO INC: $1,075 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $950 · Animals+37 more: $18,725 · Animals+37 moreIndividual grant recipient: $3,325 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED FOR A CAUSE: $1,825 · OtherUNITED FOR A CAUSEVILLA MICHELLE ALBERGUE DE ANIMALES: $950 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $800 · Other+38 more: $16,825 · Other+38 moreNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $550 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $550 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $450 · EnvironmentORPHAN ACRES INC: $650 · Human ServicesPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $650 · Public Benefit
    Animals$24,112Other$23,725Environment$1,550Human Services$650Public Benefit$650

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWNIE BLONDIE FOUNDATION INC: $3,362 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAVE A SATO INC: $1,075 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $950 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $675 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $675 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $675 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $675 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $675 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetORPHAN ACRES INC: $650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRing Dog Rescue Inc: $650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS OF WAR INC: $650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLast Chance for Animals: $650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC: $550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC: $550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY: $525 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARABIAN RESCUE MISSION INC: $525 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED PAW PROJECT: $525 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREY2K USA WORLDWIDE INC: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ANIMAL RESCUE US INC: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gorilla Foundation: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINTE DONKEY RESCUE INC: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRIMARILY PRIMATES INC: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDoris Day Animal League: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER PRESERVATION CENTER INC: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEquine Voices Rescue & Sanctuary: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Place: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFront Range Equine Rescue: $425 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEAN CASEY ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRIDEROCK WILDLIFE REFUGE: $325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World Action Fund: $325 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $325 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BROWNIE BLONDIE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds SAVE A SATO INC ↗
    • Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
    • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
    • Who funds Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc ↗
    • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
    • Who funds SPCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
    • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
    • Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
    • Who funds Humane World for Animals International ↗
    • Who funds ORPHAN ACRES INC ↗
    • Who funds Ring Dog Rescue Inc ↗
    • Who funds SAVE THE CHIMPS INC ↗
    • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
    • Who funds PAWS OF WAR INC ↗
    • Who funds Last Chance for Animals ↗
    • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds ANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC ↗
    • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC ↗
    • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
    • Who funds CASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
    • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
    • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
    • Who funds NORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
    • Who funds NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    PC Fund for Animals C…Bradford Family Found…Joyce a Ward Foundati…The Susan and Ford Sc…Paula Knickerbocker F…Seckinger Foundation …The Gerald B Shreiber…Butchkie Foundation I…John R Oltman Charita…The Patricia Florence…Surendra and Karen Gu…Edwin D Marks Animal …
    PC Fund for Animals Charitable TrWY40.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Bradford Family Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · Paula Knickerbocker Foundation Inc · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation · Butchkie Foundation Inc · John R Oltman Charitable Foundation · The Patricia Florence Miller Trust · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Edwin D Marks Animal Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      4get no government money at all
      5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home