Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Duda Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$708kArts & Culture$589kPhilanthropy$503kHousing & Shelter$50kCrime & Legal$38kHuman Services$36kCivil Rights$8kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ROCHESTER$30,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC$30,000
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$20,000
STRONG MUSEUM$17,179
AL SIGL FOUNDATION INC$15,970
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROCHESTER$12,000
ROCHESTER PREP CHARTER SCHOOLS - UNCOMMON SCHOOLS$10,000
BLACKFRIARS THEATRE$8,204
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$6,800
MCQUAID JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
ROCHESTER BROADWAY THEATRE LEAGUE$2,500
ST JOSEPH'S NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$2,500
ST PETER'S KITCHEN$2,000
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION$1,000
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $12k → 14%REACH Advocacy: $30k → 14%REACH Advocacy: $5k → 14%REACH Advocacy: $4k → 14%Brightstar Community: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 27 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
15

Total granted

$1.9M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

52%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NAZARETH UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $462k · revenue +17%
  • MW
    MARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $460k · revenue +89%
  • AS
    AL SIGL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $133k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • UP
    University Preparatory Charter School
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • EI
    EDCEPTIONAL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rochester General College of Health Careers

The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.

Education
2
Rochester Public Library

To engage the community in life-long learning for all through equal access to information, technology, gathering spaces and expert staff.

Education
3
Rit Global Delivery Corporation

Provide administrative and other support services to academic programs sponsored by rochester institute of technology both in the united states and abroad.

Education
4
Rochester General Health System

Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.

Health
5
Roosevelt University

Roosevelt university is an independent, non-profit, metropolitan university and national leader in educating socially conscious citizens for active and dedicated lives as leaders in their professions and their communities. the university's…

6
Rochester Management Inc

To provide clean, safe, well maintained, and affordable apartments and townhouses, suitable for anyone, in many locations throughout rochester, new york.

Housing & Shelter
7
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Rochester Public Library Foundation

The foundation's mission is to raise private funds for educational and informational resources and projects in a manner that does not diminish the need for strong public funding, and to educate the community about the library's vital role…

Philanthropy
10
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

11
Compeer Rochester Inc

Through supportive friendships, enhance the wellness of those with social and emotional barriers.

Health
12
Rochester Prep Foundation Inc

Rochester prep foundation was formed to support rochester preparatory charter schools, both operationally and in connection with the acquisition and development of facilities.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rochester School of the Holy Childhood I and the most unlike its peers is Judicial Process Commission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Museums & Cultural Institut…Rochester K-12 Education Ne…Emergency Food AssistancePerforming Arts Organizatio…Youth Skills & Arts ProgramsFaith-Based Community AidYouth Amateur Sports LeaguesDisability Services Organiz…Community Support ServicesMonroe County Professional …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number14%4%<5yr12%12%5–10yr17%12%10–20yr18%28%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr25%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value14%3%<5yr12%0%5–10yr17%1%10–20yr18%15%20–35yr14%2%35–55yr25%79%55yr+

The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/25
the rest of the field
8%
334/4,368

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUM — $459,684 · OtherMARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUMUnited Way of Greater Rochester Inc — $345,000 · OtherUnited Way of Greater Rochester IncJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ROCHESTER — $83,600 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ROCHESTERBLACKFRIARS THEATRE — $43,704 · Other+29 more — $170,006 · Other+29 moreNAZARETH UNIVERSITY — $462,000 · EducationNAZARETH UNIVERSITYRochester Institute of Technology — $119,500 · EducationRochester Institute of TechnologySYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $23,855 · Education+4 more — $16,552 · EducationAL SIGL FOUNDATION INC — $132,550 · PhilanthropyREACH Advocacy Inc — $38,000 · Human ServicesFamily Promise of Greater Rochester Inc — $12,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesJUDICIAL PROCESS COMMISSION INC — $38,100 · Crime & LegalROCHESTER BROADWAY THEATRE LEAGUE INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureEQUICENTER INC — $4,700 · HealthNATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC — $310 · Health
Other$1,101,994Education$621,907Philanthropy$132,550Human Services$51,000Crime & Legal$38,100Arts & Culture$20,000Health$5,010

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNAZARETH UNIVERSITY — $462,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUM — $459,684 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetAL SIGL FOUNDATION INC — $132,550 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $119,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL PROCESS COMMISSION INC — $38,100 over 2y, 16% of budgetREACH Advocacy Inc — $38,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $32,100 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $23,855 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER BROADWAY THEATRE LEAGUE INC — $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Promise of Greater Rochester Inc — $12,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetROCHESTER PREP CHARTER SCHOOLS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDCEPTIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEQUICENTER INC — $4,700 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST PETERS KITCHEN INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSt Joseph's House of Hospitality — $2,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget490 Farmers Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPENFIELD PATRIOTS SPORTS BOOSTER CLUB INC — $1,450 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBrightstar Community Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC — $310 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILDHOOD I — $102 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAZARETH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUM
  • Who funds AL SIGL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology
  • Who funds JUDICIAL PROCESS COMMISSION INC
  • Who funds REACH Advocacy Inc
  • Who funds MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ROCHESTER BROADWAY THEATRE LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds Family Promise of Greater Rochester Inc
  • Who funds ROCHESTER PREP CHARTER SCHOOLS
  • Who funds EDCEPTIONAL INC
  • Who funds EQUICENTER INC
  • Who funds ST PETERS KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds St Joseph's House of Hospitality
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc
  • Who funds 490 Farmers Inc
  • Who funds PENFIELD PATRIOTS SPORTS BOOSTER CLUB INC
  • Who funds Brightstar Community Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Community FoundationNY32.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Charles J & Burton S August Family Foundation · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Alstom Signaling Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Duda Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Duda Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Duda Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph