· Private foundation
Charles J & Burton S August Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of CHARLES J & BURTON S AUGUST FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $286k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES | $50,000 |
| SPIRITUS CHRISTI PRISON OUTREACH | $50,000 |
| UNITY | $50,000 |
| ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $50,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $45,000 |
| MARY CARIOLA CHILDRENS CENTER | $44,770 |
| EQUICENTER | $30,000 |
| ROCHESTER PRESBYTERIAN HOME | $26,732 |
| FRIENDLY HOME | $25,000 |
| FOODLINK | $25,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ROCHESTER | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR HOPE | $24,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL NEW YORK | $20,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $20,000 |
| AURORA HOUSE | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $675k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Rochester Institute of Technology6× · 2017–2025 · $232k · revenue +61%- RCRochester Childfirst Network4× · 2018–2024 · $134k · revenue +19%
- HHHOPE HALL3× · 2017–2023 · $129k · revenue +242%
Funded once
- RPROCHESTER PUBLIC CHARTER PARTNERSone grant, 2017 · $100k
- LALIFETIME ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue -90%
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Rochester NY Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +253%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.
To provide clean, safe, well maintained, and affordable apartments and townhouses, suitable for anyone, in many locations throughout rochester, new york.
Through supportive friendships, enhance the wellness of those with social and emotional barriers.
The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…
NeighborWorks Rochester collaborates with people and partners to strengthen, sustain and promote city neighborhoods. Our services are available to a wide spectrum of the community, including existing and potential homeowners, tenants and…
The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.
The rochesterworks system stimulates local economic growth by providing outstanding employment education, support, and training services.
Greater rochester housing partnership, inc. (grhp) was established primarily to provide financing for affordable housing to social services and housing agencies, either directly or by participating with banks, in the rochester, new york…
The Rochester/Monroe County Homeless Continuum of Care (CoC) is a collaborative partnership which provides leadership, linkages, education, and guidance to eliminate homelessness.
To establish, erect and maintain a general hospital and dispensary in the county of monroe, ny for medical and surgical aid, care and treatment of persons in need thereof; to carry on and conduct a training school for nurses; to promote…
The organization is organized and operated for the benefit of all of the affiliates within rochester regional health system. the organization supports and assists the affiliates by reviewing and monitoring their missions, objectives,…
The mission of the rochester rhio is to provide the rochester medical service area with a system for a secure health information exchange that allows for timely access to clinical information and improved decision making. the primary goal…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rochester Area Community Foundation Initiatives Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Gardenaerial Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds Rochester Childfirst Network ↗
- Who funds HOPE HALL ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE FAMILY OF AGENCIES ↗
- Who funds MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOMESTEADS FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LIFETIME ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOODLINK INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds MARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Rochester NY Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUICENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Disability Rights Inc ↗
- Who funds FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION SUCCESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPIRITUS CHRISTI PRISON OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER FRIENDLY HOME ↗
- Who funds PERINATAL NETWORK OF MONROE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Veterans Outreach Center Inc ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds BADEN STREET SETTLEMENT OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTED COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INITIATIVES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Polisseni Foundation Inc · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles J & Burton S August Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Charles J & Burton S August Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Charles J & Burton S August Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.