· Private foundation
Dsyr Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER | $5,000 |
| YESHIVA SHAAREI TZION | $5,000 |
| NECHAMA COMFORT | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| CONGREGATION RINAT YISRAEL | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| TO LIFE | $1,000 |
| PROJECT EZRA | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| PEOPLE WHO CARE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NINECHAMACOMFORT INC6× · 2019–2024 · $13k · revenue +38%
- PEProject Ezrah Needs Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +106%
- OCOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- VHVaad Hatzedaka Incone grant, 2023 · $4k
- PMPark Mikva Incone grant, 2017 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide financial aid and assistance to the poor, sick & disabled people, and monetary support to needy families in time of need.
Provides day care in the heart of tel-aviv. provides afternoon activities for young children and youth. there are evening classes for adults covering a variety of subjects.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.
To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.
Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel Incs mission is to illuminate authentic Torah Judaism in Israel and the diaspora. This Modern Orthodox movement is shaping Jewish communities worldwide, fueled by a comprehensive educational network,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITIES CONFRONTING SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION INC ↗
- Who funds NECHAMACOMFORT INC ↗
- Who funds Project Ezrah Needs Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
- Who funds Vaad Hatzedaka Inc ↗
- Who funds Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GATES OF ZION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HASC INC ↗
- Who funds NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MICHLALAH YERUSHALAYIM INC ↗
- Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TO LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds CHAI 4EVER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE WHO CARE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LYME DISEASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fjc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Cross River Community Foundation · The Kahan Family Foundation · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dsyr Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Special Children Center — 5% of income from government
- Chai 4EVER Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.