Skip to content

· Private foundation

Druckenmiller Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136M
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$40M
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$327MHealth$193MRecreation & Sports$51MEducation$20MEnvironment$15MArts & Culture$4.9MPhilanthropy$2.5MAnimals$892kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+14 grants · $134M
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER$40,450,000
BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC$31,164,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$20,100,000
HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE$14,500,000
FOUNDATION FOR SARCOIDOSIS RESEARCH$10,000,000
NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION$6,000,000
BOWDOIN COLLEGE$5,000,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$2,000,000
THE SPENCE SCHOOL$1,550,000
AM MUSEUM OF NAT'L HISTORY$1,505,000
TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY$500,000
NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$500,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$400,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN$250,000
ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER$216,666
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $326.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5k → 7%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $40.0M → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $26.0M → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $16.5M → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $14.5M → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $6.0M → 17%BROADWAY HOUSING COMMUNITIES: $300k → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $50.8M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $50.0M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $49.9M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $41.2M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $31.2M → 17%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $15k → 17%NYC MISSION SOCIETY: $50k → 17%NYC MISSION SOCIETY: $40k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MD
KS
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$607M · 72 repeat orgs$6.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

72 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

72
58

Total granted

$607M
$5.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+18%

Still filing today

46%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $71M · revenue +64%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $50M · revenue +167% · 34% of their budget
  • NY
    NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $19M · revenue +20% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • AO
    AMERICAN ORTHOPAEDIC SOCIETY FOR SPORTS MEDICINE
    one grant, 2021 · $1.1M · revenue +0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • LH
    LENOX HILL HOSPITAL MIDWIFERY CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Manhattan; the most unlike its peers is Dms Dream Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/74
Grantees still filing
45/74
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $223,048,000 · Human ServicesBLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INCHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $103,000,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC+5 more: $560,000 · Human ServicesNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $86,595,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE MEDICA…+105 more: $12,548,166 · Other+105 moreMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $70,510,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KE…NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC: $19,000,000 · HealthNEW YORK STEM CEL…+12 more: $3,600,000 · HealthCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $50,075,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL P…+1 more: $550,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SPENCE SCHOOL: $7,750,000 · EducationBowdoin College: $5,200,000 · Education50CAN INC: $4,000,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 · Education+10 more: $1,075,000 · EducationENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $14,400,000 · Environment+2 more: $450,000 · EnvironmentFOUNDATION FOR SARCOIDOSIS RESEARCH: $10,350,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,700,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHAMPTON BATH & TENNIS CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $500,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $320,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$326,608,000Other$99,143,166Health$93,110,000Recreation & Sports$50,625,000Education$19,025,000Environment$14,850,000Philanthropy$12,870,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $223,048,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $103,000,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $70,510,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $50,075,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC: $19,000,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $14,400,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SARCOIDOSIS RESEARCH: $10,350,000 over 2y, 74% of budgetTHE SPENCE SCHOOL: $7,750,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetBowdoin College: $5,200,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budget50CAN INC: $4,000,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,700,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ORTHOPAEDIC SOCIETY FOR SPORTS MEDICINE: $1,100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $1,015,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHED NYC INC: $750,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $616,666 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKASPAROV CHESS FOUNDATION INC: $550,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON BATH & TENNIS CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $500,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetOCEANA INC: $400,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNew York University: $350,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUTURO MEDIA GROUP: $310,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetBROADWAY HOUSING COMMUNITIES INC: $300,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEL EDUCATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM: $115,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetCIDNY - INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC: $100,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetN Y C MISSION SOCIETY: $90,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKEREN OR INC: $75,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $75,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBELLEVUE ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFILM FORUM INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SARCOIDOSIS RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE SPENCE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
  • Who funds 50CAN INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ORTHOPAEDIC SOCIETY FOR SPORTS MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds THE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHED NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KASPAROV CHESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHAMPTON BATH & TENNIS CLUB CHARITABLE FUND ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds THE FUTURO MEDIA GROUP ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY HOUSING COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN ↗
  • Who funds EL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY24.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Martin D & Jean Shafiroff Foundation · The Chase and Stephanie Coleman Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Ford Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Druckenmiller Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Druckenmiller Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Avalon School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Druckenmiller Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Druckenmiller Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Druckenmiller’s filings →

More from the funding graph