· Private foundation
Dr Seuss Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of Dr Seuss Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The San Diego Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Dr Seuss Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 20 organizations, $106k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| READING LITERACY LEARNING INC | $7,500 |
| AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS CALIFORNIA | $6,000 |
| LAS PATRONAS | $5,500 |
| SEE BENEATH INC | $5,000 |
| FACE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SAN DIEGO SENIOR GAMES ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| MOONLIGHT CULTURAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO | $5,000 |
| MURPHY'S PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE | $5,000 |
| HOME START INCORPORATED | $5,000 |
| BURN INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| LA JOLLA HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| SAN DIEGO YOUNG ARTISTS MUSIC ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| JAPANESE FRIENDSHIP GARDEN SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2020, 31 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ZSZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO3× · 2017–2019 · $1.1M · revenue +28%
- USUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $166k · revenue +78%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- SMSPRINGFIELD MUSEUMone grant, 2019 · $350k
- SDSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ARTgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +99%
- SMSPRINGFIELD MUSEUMS CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
to advance regional contemporary art and artists while fostering cultural equity through access to meaningful art experiences
San Diego Theatres, Inc. (SDTI) is a not-for-profit public benefit corporation established to manage and operate publicly owned performing arts theatres. SDTI was established in 2003 by the San Diego Convention Center Corporation (SDCCC),…
Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…
San Diego Junior Theatre (Junior Theatre) was incorporated in 1948 as a nonprofit corporation and is the oldest youth theatre in the nation, offering affordable camps, classes, and outreach programs for children ages 3-18; as well as six…
Programmed and coordinated visits to san diego by international visitors and escorts, working in association with appropriate united states government agencies and the global ties u.s. network.
To drive visitor demand to economically benefit the san diego region.
Promote Access to Health Care for all San Diegans
The Museum functions as an educational and cultural institutionexercising community responsibility for the preservation of the automotive arts and sciences
The organization's mission is to provide funding for the best cancer research ideas in san diego. all proceeds from curebound stay in san diego to fund innovative and collaborative cancer research.
The san diego municipal employees association (sdmea) is dedicated to being a strong and effective advocate for san diego city employees. sdmea is united to improve employees' standard of living and promote their fair treatment by…
To increase awareness and action toward issues impacting seniors and to increase philanthropy to senior-focused organizations. together, we can create a future where seniors are no longer vulnerable but vibrant.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Charter One Hundred Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD MUSEUMS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds USS MIDWAY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds READING LITERACY LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF LA JOLLA ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF MAN DBA MUSEUM OF US ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds LAS PATRONAS ↗
- Who funds San Diego Senior Games Association ↗
- Who funds Words Alive ↗
- Who funds HOME START INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds Burn Institute ↗
- Who funds THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE ↗
- Who funds WRITE OUT LOUD ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SERVING SENIORS ↗
- Who funds PATRONS OF THE PRADO ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds VISTA HILL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds La Jolla Historical Society ↗
- Who funds GREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds Traveling Stories ↗
- Who funds OLD GLOBE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds THE NEW CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE CHARTER ONE HUNDRED INC ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Mingei International Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · David C Copley Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dr Seuss Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Springfield Museums Corporation — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dr Seuss Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Dr Seuss Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.