California · Nonprofit
MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE
MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,013 to it, the largest being Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank ($5,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,122 food & nutrition nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,122 food & nutrition nonprofits under $100k, FY2023
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Feeding San Diegoshared fundersportfolio match
- Alliance Healthcare Foundationshared fundersportfolio match
- East County Economic Development Councillocalportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2022 99%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $5k → $13.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 3 of 4 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 50% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
50% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE's grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $13 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Feeding San Diegoshared fundersportfolio matchCA · backs 24 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Alliance Healthcare Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchCA · backs 29 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- East County Economic Development Councillocalportfolio matchCA · funds 223 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- The Thursday Club Foundationlocalportfolio matchCA · funds 78 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Ecology Centerportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Fair Food Network Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Last Mile San Diegoportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Means Database Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Pisa Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Arthur Q Johnson Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- One Percent to End Hunger Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lucky Duck Foundationshared funderslocalCA · backs 27 organizations that share your funders · funds 67 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
100% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE?
- MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,013 to it, the largest being Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank ($5,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $10,013 in grants to MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE.
- Who is the largest funder of MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE?
- Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank is the largest funder on record, with $5,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like MURPHYS PRODUCE WITH PURPOSE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2019–2023), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing