· Private foundation
Dr Prem Reddy Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k39 grants · $123k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $188k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| TELANGANA AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATI | $50,000 |
| TELANGANA AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATI | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $36,000 |
| VICTOR VALLEY COLLEGE | $28,000 |
| NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY | $22,926 |
| TELUGU ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALI | $15,000 |
| INDIA HOME | $15,000 |
| KENT STATE UNIVERSITY | $13,550 |
| AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY | $13,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF RIVERSIDE | $13,000 |
| UCLA | $12,000 |
| WISCONSIN ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATI | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
59 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $309k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VVVictor Valley College Foundation3× · 2020–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +63% · 49% of their budget
- TATELANGANA AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +80%
- CBCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY2× · 2022–2024 · $8k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- AOART OF LIVING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -46%
- NANORTH AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATIONS INCone grant, 2021 · $175k
- AAAMERICAN ASSOC OF PHYSICIANS INDIAone grant, 2023 · $110k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…
The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Redlands and the most unlike its peers is Loving Hearts for All. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 248 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRIME HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Victor Valley College Foundation ↗
- Who funds ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OF INDIAN ORIGIN ↗
- Who funds American Telugu Association ↗
- Who funds TELANGANA AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TELUGU ASSOCIATION OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds TELANGANA PEOPLES ASSOCIATION OF DALLAS ↗
- Who funds INDIA HOME INC ↗
- Who funds TELUGU ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds NORTH AMERICA TELUGU SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds APNA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Hanimireddy Lakireddy Family Foundation · America's Charities · Bright Funds Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · California Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dr Prem Reddy Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dr Prem Reddy Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Dr Prem Reddy Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.