Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dr Petra and Owen Rissman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$274k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$466kPhilanthropy$460kInternational$315kArts & Culture$272kEducation$167kRecreation & Sports$75kHuman Services$59kSocial Science$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$75,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FUND$50,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$30,000
UNICEF$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$30,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$25,000
LYRIC OPERA$10,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
HOLY SPIRIT MISSIONARY SISTERS$2,500
SWEETWATER SPECTRUM$2,500
HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$2,000
MUSIC OF THE BAROQUE$2,000
SACRED HEART$2,000
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$1,500
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$1,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SWEETWATER SPECTRUM: $3k → 9%SWEETWATER SPECTRUM: $2k → 9%SWEETWATER SPECTRUM: $1k → 9%SWEETWATER SPECTRUM: $1k → 9%SWEETWATER SPECTRUM: $1k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE OF GLENCOE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 21 repeat orgs$276k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
25

Total granted

$1.4M
$174k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+17%

Still filing today

52%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +98%
  • University of Chicago
    5× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +52%
  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • MC
    MOTT CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • BR
    BRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +32%
  • CP
    CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
2
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
5
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
6
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Historic Pullman Foundation Dba Friends of Pullman. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
24/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FUND: $200,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FUNDUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINEUNICEF: $130,000 · OtherUNICEFLYRIC OPERA: $90,000 · OtherLYRIC OPERANORTHWESTERN MEDICINE - FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $85,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEDICINE - FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINEINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY: $53,500 · OtherINFANT WELFARE SOCIETYCS MOTT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $35,000 · OtherNorthwestern University: $75,000 · OtherNorthwestern University+25 more: $184,374 · Other+25 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $155,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $15,000 · InternationalUNITED STAT…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $15,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $110,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNIT…JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDE…TIDES FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUND…Chicago Symphony Orchestra: $144,975 · Arts & CultureChicago Sy…Lyric Opera of Chicago: $20,000 · Arts & CultureLyric Oper…+2 more: $7,000 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Chicago: $150,000 · EducationUniversit…+3 more: $7,200 · EducationEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $50,500 · HealthBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthRush University Medical Center: $10,000 · HealthBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS: $5,000 · HealthFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $75,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,002,874International$185,000Philanthropy$185,000Arts & Culture$171,975Education$157,200Health$90,500Community Improvement$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $155,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $144,975 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $110,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $50,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $14,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWEETWATER SPECTRUM INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF GLENCOE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMUSIC OF THE BAROQUE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC PULLMAN FOUNDATION DBA FRIENDS OF PULLMAN: $2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budget826 Valencia: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY ARTS & LECTURES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cradle Society: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS POLICE ASSOCIATION: $99 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds SWEETWATER SPECTRUM INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF GLENCOE ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC OF THE BAROQUE ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC PULLMAN FOUNDATION DBA FRIENDS OF PULLMAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr Petra and Owen Rissman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr Petra and Owen Rissman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dr Petra and Owen Rissman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph