Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dr Bhorade Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$401k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$718kEducation$74kArts & Culture$18kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$4kCommunity Improvement$2kCivil Rights$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$400,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$400,000
WAYS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $675 → 12%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $125 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $350 → 12%LAW ENFOCEMENT OFFICERS RELIEF FUND: $75 → 9%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $100 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $30 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $160 → 12%LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REL FUND: $50 → 9%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $100 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $105 → 12%LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REL FUND: $50 → 9%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $50 → 11%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $30 → 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $30 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
OH
PA
CA
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$576k · 37 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
25

Total granted

$576k
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+26%

Still filing today

54%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +76%
  • FS
    FORSYTH SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $15k · revenue +41%
  • MI
    Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • AC
    ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +4%
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
6
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
7
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
8
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

9
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
12
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Maharashtra Mandal Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersCancer Support OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesVeteran Support ServicesEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Developmental Disabilities …Land Conservation Organizat…Fallen First Responder Supp…Animal Rescue and AdoptionGovernment Accountability R…Independent K-8 SchoolsSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%14%10–20yr15%17%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr24%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%2%10–20yr15%0%20–35yr16%80%35–55yr24%18%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,452

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $405,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF MEDICINEADVOCATE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL — $46,250 · OtherADVOCATE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL+36 more — $43,715 · Other+36 moreADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $250,000 · HealthADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION+7 more — $12,510 · HealthWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · EducationFORSYTH SCHOOL INC — $15,000 · EducationMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School — $5,500 · EducationAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC — $2,250 · Education+1 more — $125 · EducationMAHARASHTRA MANDAL CHICAGO — $15,500 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $2,400 · Arts & CultureAARP FOUNDATION — $2,168 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,390 · Human ServicesKIDS WISH NETWORK INC — $435 · Human ServicesLAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS RELIEF FUND INC — $175 · Human Services+1 more — $105 · Human ServicesENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $300 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited Inc — $50 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $50 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $25 · EnvironmentDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION — $250 · Public Benefit
Other$494,965Health$262,510Education$52,875Arts & Culture$17,900Human Services$4,273Environment$425Public Benefit$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAHARASHTRA MANDAL CHICAGO — $15,500 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetFORSYTH SCHOOL INC — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC — $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $4,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC — $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION — $2,168 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,390 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC — $435 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION — $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans — $195 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $175 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS RELIEF FUND INC — $175 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC — $125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $105 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MAHARASHTRA MANDAL CHICAGO
  • Who funds FORSYTH SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC
  • Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
  • Who funds KIDS WISH NETWORK INC
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
  • Who funds DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS RELIEF FUND INC
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC
  • Who funds UNITED STATES DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dr Bhorade Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph