Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dr Bhorade Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$300
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$300
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$718kEducation$74kArts & Culture$18kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$4kCommunity Improvement$2kCivil Rights$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
1
States reached
$192k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAYS$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $675 → 12%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $125 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $350 → 12%LAW ENFOCEMENT OFFICERS RELIEF FUND: $75 → 9%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $100 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $30 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $160 → 12%LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REL FUND: $50 → 9%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $100 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $105 → 12%LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REL FUND: $50 → 9%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $50 → 11%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $30 → 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $30 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
OH
PA
CA
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$576k · 37 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
25

Total granted

$576k
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+26%

Still filing today

54%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +76%
  • FS
    FORSYTH SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $15k · revenue +41%
  • MI
    Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • AC
    ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +4%
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
5
The American Association of Immunologists Inc

The american association of immunologists (aai) is an international association representing professionally trained scientists who conduct basic and clinical research on the biology of the immune system. aai is dedicated to advancing the…

Health
6
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
American Academy of Neurology

The AAN strives to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
American Psychiatric Association

The american psychiatric association (apa) was incorporated in 2000 as a 501(c)(6) trade association. its 38,000 u.s. and international physician members specialize in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health and disorders, including…

Community Improvement
10
American Osteopathic Association

The american osteopathic association (aoa) is a membership association representing more than 168,000 osteopathic physicians (do) and osteopathic medical students. as the primary certifying body for do and the accrediting agency for all…

Health
11
Association of American Universities Inc

Founded in 1900, aau is composed of 71 distinguished institutions in the united states and canada that continually advance society through education, research, and discovery. our u.s. member universities earn the majority of competitively…

Education
12
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Maharashtra Mandal Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $405,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF MEDICINEADVOCATE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $46,250 · OtherADVOCATE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL+36 more: $44,015 · Other+36 moreADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · HealthADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION+7 more: $12,510 · HealthWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationFORSYTH SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · EducationMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $5,500 · EducationAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $2,250 · Education+1 more: $125 · EducationMAHARASHTRA MANDAL CHICAGO: $15,500 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $2,400 · Arts & CultureAARP FOUNDATION: $2,168 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,390 · Human ServicesKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $435 · Human ServicesLAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS RELIEF FUND INC: $175 · Human Services+1 more: $105 · Human ServicesENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $300 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $50 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited Inc: $50 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $25 · EnvironmentDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $250 · Public Benefit
Other$495,265Health$262,510Education$52,875Arts & Culture$17,900Human Services$4,273Environment$425Public Benefit$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAHARASHTRA MANDAL CHICAGO: $15,500 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetFORSYTH SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $4,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $2,168 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,390 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $435 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $195 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $175 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS RELIEF FUND INC: $175 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC: $125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $105 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MAHARASHTRA MANDAL CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds FORSYTH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds KIDS WISH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr Bhorade Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr Bhorade Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dr Bhorade Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph