Skip to content

· Private foundation

Doss T Sutton Charitable Foundation Mark Barr and Joe Powers

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$274kArts & Culture$264kHuman Services$261kReligion$192kHousing & Shelter$47kYouth Development$37kHealth$13kAnimals$2k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $86k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF FORT SMITH$25,000
COMMUNITY SERVICE CLEARINGHOUSE$16,000
METHODIST VILLAGE$15,000
COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS$10,000
US MARSHALLS MUSEUM$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
UAFS FOUNDATION$8,000
FORT SMITH BOYS AND GIRLS$7,000
ARKANSAS FAMILY ALLIANCE$5,000
COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION$5,000
FORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY$5,000
HEART TO HEART$2,000
FORT SMITH REGIONAL ART MUSEUM$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 17%LINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER: $5k → 17%COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 17%LINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER: $5k → 17%COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 17%CHILDRENS EMERGENCY SHELTER: $5k → 17%CHILDRENS EMERGENCY SHELTER: $4k → 17%CHILDRENS EMERGENCY SHELTER: $4k → 17%CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $4k → 17%CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $4k → 17%COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 17%COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 17%COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 17%CHILDRENS EMERGENCY SHELTER: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -99% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
1

Total granted

$1.1M
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-99%

Still filing today

53%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COMMUNITY SERVICES CLEARINGHOUSE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $114k · revenue +4%
  • FS
    FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +19%
  • FS
    FORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER
    6× · 2018–2023 · $22k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SC
    SEBASTIAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -99%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fort Smith Children's Emergency Shelter Foundation Inc

To support the activities of the fort smith children's emergency shelter, inc. through education and philanthropic activities.

Human Services
2
Fort Smith Heritage Foundation Inc

To protect, preserve, and promote the wm. h. h. clayton house and the victorian era of fort smith.

—
3
Fort Smith Montessori School Inc

Education of students from three years through eighth grade.

Education
4
Kitties & Kanines Shelter

Our mission is to provide non-lethal solutions to the homeless, abandoned, and feral animal population of fort smith, arkansas. we will do this through re-unifying animals with their owners, adopting animals to new families, or…

Animals
5
Fort Smith Christian Family Servicesinc

From conception to birth and beyond, we uphold the sanctity of human life; sharing the gospel of jesus christ, offering knowledge, medical services and support.

Human Services
6
Fort Smith Public Library Endowment Trust

Funding of library projects.

Philanthropy
7
Fort Smith Boys Club Charitable Foundation Trust

To provide support for the fort smith boys & girls club operating needs.

Youth Development
8
Fort Smith Symphony Association

The fort smith symphony association is dedicated to providing our community with excellent orchestral programs which entertain, educate, and enhance the quality of life.

Arts & Culture
9
Girls' Shelter of Fort Smith

To provide a home for girls and suitable placements for girls in the event of the need for emergency placement.

—
10
Smith County Medical Society

Maintain a professional society of physicians.

—
11
Boys Shelter Inc

To provide shelter, food, education, counseling, medical care, clothing and supplies to troubled boys in fort smith, arkansas and the surrounding area.

Community Improvement
12
Fort Mill History Museum

To preserve Fort Mill's heritage for the benefit of present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Smith Boys & Girls Clubs; the most unlike its peers is Arkansas Family Alliance F/K/a Whitsonlife Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF FORT SMITH: $237,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF FORT SMITHUNITED STATES MARSHALS MUSEUM: $175,000 · OtherUNITED STATES MARSHALS MUSEUMCOMMUNITY SERVICES CLEARINGHOUSE: $114,100 · OtherCOMMUNITY SERVICES CLEARINGHOUSESALVATION ARMY: $65,800 · OtherSALVATION ARMYUAFS FOUNDATION: $37,000 · OtherHARBOR HOUSE: $29,000 · Other+5 more: $63,000 · Other+5 moreMETHODIST VILLAGE INC: $185,000 · Housing & ShelterMETHODIST VILLAGE I…US MARSHALS MUSEUM INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureUS MARSHA…FORT SMITH ART CENTER INC: $14,300 · Arts & CultureFORT SMIT…COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY…FORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFORT SMIT…COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $22,800 · Human ServicesFORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $22,300 · Human ServicesLINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $30,300 · Youth DevelopmentARKANSAS FAMILY ALLIANCE F/K/A WHITSONLIFE INC: $7,500 · ReligionSEBASTIAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 · Animals
Other$720,900Housing & Shelter$185,000Arts & Culture$89,300Human Services$55,100Youth Development$30,300Religion$7,500Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETHODIST VILLAGE INC: $185,000 over 8y, 30% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES CLEARINGHOUSE: $114,100 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetUS MARSHALS MUSEUM INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $30,300 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $22,800 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $22,300 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFORT SMITH ART CENTER INC: $14,300 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetARKANSAS FAMILY ALLIANCE F/K/A WHITSONLIFE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSEBASTIAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METHODIST VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES CLEARINGHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds US MARSHALS MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS FAMILY ALLIANCE F/K/A WHITSONLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEBASTIAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William Thomas & May Pitman Hennessy FoundationAR26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William Thomas & May Pitman Hennessy Foundation · Elizabeth H & Stanley E Evans Charitable Foundation · Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Maurras Family Charitable Trust · The Griffin Charitable Organization · Robert a & Mary Carleton Young Foundation · Rosalie Tilles Childrens Home Inc · Walter O Caldwell Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Doss T Sutton Charitable Foundation Mark Barr and Joe Powers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Doss T Sutton Charitable Foundation Mark Barr and Joe Powers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Doss T Sutton Charitable Foundation Mark Barr and Joe Powers?

    Find your warmest path to Doss T Sutton Charitable Foundation Mark Barr and Joe Powers through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Doss T Sutton Charitable Foundation Mark Barr and Joe Powers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph