· Private foundation
Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC | $5,000 |
| DONALD W REYNOLDS CANCER SUPPORT HOUSE | $5,000 |
| RIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS | $5,000 |
| FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $5,000 |
| GREGORY KISTLER TREATMENT CENTER | $5,000 |
| RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| FORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY | $4,000 |
| GIRL'S SHELTER OF FORT SMITH INC | $3,000 |
| BOYS SHELTER OF FORT SMITH | $3,000 |
| CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER | $3,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $3,000 |
| ANTIOCH YOUTH & FAMILY | $2,700 |
| FORT SMITH SYMPHONY | $2,500 |
| GIRL'S INC OF FORT SMITH | $2,500 |
| PROJECT COMPASSION INC | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RHRIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +69%
- GSGOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC8× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +134%
- TGTHE GREGORY KISTLER TREATMENT CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +120%
Funded once
- ICINTERFAITH COMMUNITY CENTERone grant, 2022 · $3k
- SASt Annes Society Incone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +14%
- LCLINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to provide non-lethal solutions to the homeless, abandoned, and feral animal population of fort smith, arkansas. we will do this through re-unifying animals with their owners, adopting animals to new families, or…
To support the activities of the fort smith children's emergency shelter, inc. through education and philanthropic activities.
From conception to birth and beyond, we uphold the sanctity of human life; sharing the gospel of jesus christ, offering knowledge, medical services and support.
To provide shelter, food, education, counseling, medical care, clothing and supplies to troubled boys in fort smith, arkansas and the surrounding area.
To enhance the quality of education in the fort smith public schools by providing the necessary funds for programs not otherwise funded by the fort smith public school district.
Education of students from three years through eighth grade.
The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowering them to build lives free of violence.
Recruitment of jobs and capital investment in fort smith, ar
The mission of the arc of smith county is to enhance the general welfare of persons with intellectual and development disabilities, throughout their lifetimes, by providing fully inclusive programs, services, education, advocacy, and…
To help individuals recover from alcohol and drug addictions
To provide quality comprehensive and preventative health care to all residents of the arkansas area without regard to their ability to pay.
To vigorously advocate for and enforce the legal rights of people with disabilities in arkansas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of Fort Smith and the most unlike its peers is St Annes Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC ↗
- Who funds THE GREGORY KISTLER TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS ↗
- Who funds FORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER ↗
- Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS' SHELTER OF FORT SMITH ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF FORT SMITH ↗
- Who funds FORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY ↗
- Who funds PROJECT COMPASSION INC ↗
- Who funds FORT SMITH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF AR FT SMITH FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds FORT SMITH ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds THE STEPS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC FOR THE RIVER VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH INC ↗
- Who funds BOST INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FORT SMITH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Elizabeth H & Stanley E Evans Charitable Foundation · William Thomas & May Pitman Hennessy Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Walter O Caldwell Foundation · Arvest Foundation · The Griffin Charitable Organization · Maurras Family Charitable Trust · Doss T Sutton Charitable Foundation Mark Barr and Joe Powers · United Way of Fort Smith Area Inc · Rosalie Tilles Childrens Home Inc · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Cadence Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.