Arkansas · Nonprofit
METHODIST VILLAGE INC
METHODIST VILLAGE INC (Arkansas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $323,000 to it, the largest being DOSS T SUTTON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION MARK BARR AND JOE POWERS ($185,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
METHODIST VILLAGE INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,472 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,472 housing & shelter nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- William Thomas & May Pitman Hennessy Foundationlocal
- Home Instead Charitiesportfolio match
- Leadingage Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
122% of METHODIST VILLAGE INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (37% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $27k → $45k.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 37% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
Left out of every figure on this page: $112k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Methodist Nursing Home of Fort Smith Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money METHODIST VILLAGE INC raised.
From the IRS filings of METHODIST VILLAGE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
METHODIST VILLAGE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
37% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund METHODIST VILLAGE INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 93% · 2019 56% · 2020 54% · 2021 42% · 2022 56% · 2023 56% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of METHODIST VILLAGE INC's grant income comes from Arkansas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $121k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- William Thomas & May Pitman Hennessy FoundationlocalAR · funds 30 organizations near you
- Home Instead Charitiesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Leadingage Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Iowa Health Care Association Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- McPherson County Community Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Central Kansas Community Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Alles Foundation Incorporatedportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Elizabeth Fry and Dupont Kirven Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Jefferson Federal Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lakeland Health Foundation Benton Harbor/Stjosephportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- WWJD FOUNDATION CO Piaker & Lyons PCportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like METHODIST VILLAGE INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Arkansas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
0% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Part of a family of 1 related entity
- Methodist Nursing Home of Fort Smith Inc · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for METHODIST VILLAGE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds METHODIST VILLAGE INC?
- METHODIST VILLAGE INC (Arkansas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $323,000 to it, the largest being DOSS T SUTTON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION MARK BARR AND JOE POWERS ($185,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does METHODIST VILLAGE INC have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $323,000 in grants to METHODIST VILLAGE INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of METHODIST VILLAGE INC?
- DOSS T SUTTON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION MARK BARR AND JOE POWERS is the largest funder on record, with $185,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like METHODIST VILLAGE INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arkansas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing