Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert a & Mary Carleton Young Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$353k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS$100,000
FORT KIDS$100,000
FORT SMITH SOCCER ASSOCIATION$35,000
RIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS$30,000
ARKANSAS FAMILY ALLIANCE$25,000
ECONOMICS ARKANSAS$25,000
CHILDREN'S SHELTER FOUNDATION$14,000
FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$9,000
FORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY$5,000
GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC$5,000
FORT SMITH PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$3,000
COUMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION$2,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COUMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fort Smith Children's Emergency Shelter Foundation Inc

To support the activities of the fort smith children's emergency shelter, inc. through education and philanthropic activities.

Human Services
2
Kitties & Kanines Shelter

Our mission is to provide non-lethal solutions to the homeless, abandoned, and feral animal population of fort smith, arkansas. we will do this through re-unifying animals with their owners, adopting animals to new families, or…

Animals
3
Friends of the Historical Museum At Fort Missoula

The friends of the historical museum at fort missoula is organized exclusively for the purpose of aiding and supporting the historical museum at fort missoula to keep missoula's history alive for the enjoyment and education of the public.

4
Fort Smith Heritage Foundation Inc

To protect, preserve, and promote the wm. h. h. clayton house and the victorian era of fort smith.

5
Girls Incorporated of Fort Smith

Girls inc. of fort smith is committed to providing a safe environment with educational and recreational programs that encourage girls to take risks and master physical, intellectual, and emotional challenges.

Youth Development
6
Fort Smith Montessori School Inc

Education of students from three years through eighth grade.

Education
7
Boys Shelter Inc

To provide shelter, food, education, counseling, medical care, clothing and supplies to troubled boys in fort smith, arkansas and the surrounding area.

Community Improvement
8
Fort Smith Public Schools Found Inc

To enhance the quality of education in the fort smith public schools by providing the necessary funds for programs not otherwise funded by the fort smith public school district.

Philanthropy
9
Fort Smith Art Center Inc

The fort smith art center is established to foster art appreciation in the community through diverse exhibitions, educational programming, dynamic events, and cultural partnerships.

Arts & Culture
10
Ark City Christian Academy Inc

Educational institution for primary and secondary age students in a non- public christian curriculum and environment

Education
11
North Arkansas Gospel Mission

Spreading the gospel through missionaries

Religion
12
Future School of Fort Smith

The school provides a personalized approach to learning via student- designed internships, personalized learning plans, and an advisor for each student.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Smith Boys & Girls Clubs and the most unlike its peers is Arkansas Family Alliance F/K/a Whitsonlife Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS — $100,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTSFORT KIDS — $100,000 · Arts & CultureFORT KIDS+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureFORT SMITH SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $35,000 · Recreation & SportsFORT SMITH …ARKANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentARKANSAS C…FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS — $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORT SMITH…RIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterRIVERVIEW…ARKANSAS FAMILY ALLIANCE F/K/A WHITSONLIFE INC — $25,000 · ReligionCHILDREN'S SHELTER FOUNDATION — $14,000 · OtherFORT SMITH PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $3,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC — $5,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $2,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$205,000Recreation & Sports$35,000Youth Development$34,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Religion$25,000Other$17,000Health$5,000Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFORT KIDS — $100,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetFORT SMITH SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $35,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetRIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS — $30,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetARKANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arvest FoundationAR23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arvest Foundation · William Thomas & May Pitman Hennessy Foundation · Elizabeth H & Stanley E Evans Charitable Foundation · The Griffin Charitable Organization · Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Doss T Sutton Charitable Foundation Mark Barr and Joe Powers · Maurras Family Charitable Trust · Walter O Caldwell Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert a & Mary Carleton Young Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph