Skip to content

· Private foundation

Don & Colletta McMillian Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$364k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.6MHealth$1.5MHuman Services$263kReligion$174kFood & Nutrition$151kArts & Culture$135kHousing & Shelter$97kCommunity Improvement$68kOther$0
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $612k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $991k
  • $250k+1 grant · $364k
$19,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL$364,000
THE TIRR FOUNDATION$229,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICENE$219,000
HOLLY HALL SCHOOL$219,000
HOUSTON CHRISTAIN UNIVERSITY$219,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FDT$55,000
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY-WACO$50,000
100 CLUB OF HOUSTON$48,000
GLIDDEN BAPTIST CHURCH$45,000
CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES$41,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$29,000
ST JUDES RESEARCH HOSPITAL$26,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NM$25,000
MEMORIAL ASISTANCE MINISTRIES$25,000
JOY JUNCTION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $41k → 6%SOUTHERN OUTDOOR DREAMS: $8k → 10%CHRILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $30k → 6%SOUTHERN OUTDOOR DREAMS: $6k → 10%SOUTHERN OUTDOOR DREAMS: $5k → 10%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN HOME INC: $10k → 6%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $10k → 6%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $10k → 6%WORK TEXAS TRAINING CENTER: $10k → 16%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN HOME: $4k → 6%MEMORIAL ASISTANCE MINISTRIES: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
CA
CO
KY
NM
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 34 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
52

Total granted

$3.1M
$549k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+26%

Still filing today

44%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $634k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TIRR Foundation
    7× · 2018–2024 · $451k · revenue +90%
  • HC
    HOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $443k · revenue +84%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    2× · 2019–2023 · $213k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • HM
    HOUSTON METHODISST HOSPITAL FDT
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • BS
    BAYLORHANKAMER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • NC
    NORTHERN CALIFORNIA SPINAL CORD NEW
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Baptist Children's Home and Family Services Inc

Provision and management of property on which a family of nonprofit ministries carries out programs and services for vulnerable children and families.

Human Services
2
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
5
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
6
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
7
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
8
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
12
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Baptist Children's Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hanley Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
29/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $443,000 · OtherHOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYHOLLY HALL SCHOOL: $419,000 · OtherHOLLY HALL SCHOOLHOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL: $364,000 · OtherHOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITALBAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICENE: $245,350 · OtherBAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICENEHOUSTON METHODISST HOSPITAL FDT: $200,000 · OtherHOUSTON METHODISST HOSPITAL FDTUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FDT: $110,000 · Other+77 more: $1,385,228 · Other+77 moreTIRR Foundation: $451,450 · HealthTIRR Foundat…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $26,000 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…+2 more: $8,000 · HealthBaylor College of Medicine: $212,750 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $39,230 · EducationThe Brookwood Community Inc: $36,250 · EducationCHILDREN AT HEART FOUNDATION INC: $20,586 · Education+1 more: $6,500 · EducationCHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC: $91,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesMemorial Assistance Ministries: $25,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN OUTDOOR DREAMS: $19,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesWork Texas Training Center: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $15,000 · AnimalsWATERMELON MOUNTAIN RANCH INC: $12,500 · AnimalsCitizens For Animal Protection Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsPAWS AND STRIPES INC: $10,000 · AnimalsROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $47,000 · Food & NutritionMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $20,000 · EnvironmentNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Environment
Other$3,166,578Health$485,450Education$315,316Human Services$201,000Animals$47,500Food & Nutrition$47,000Environment$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIRR Foundation: $451,450 over 7y, 8.3% of budgetHOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $443,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $212,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC: $91,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetThe Fay School: $47,525 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $47,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $39,230 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $36,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $34,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMemorial Assistance Ministries: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN AT HEART FOUNDATION INC: $20,586 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPNM TNMP FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetSOUTHERN OUTDOOR DREAMS: $19,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHAMPION VALLEY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWATERMELON MOUNTAIN RANCH INC: $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRACEWOOD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCitizens For Animal Protection Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPAWS AND STRIPES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWork Texas Training Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBARRETT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARCA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNABOR HOUSE COMMUNITY: $6,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRAISING MEN LAWN CARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Council on Recovery: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHANLEY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJack The Bike Man Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBakerRipley: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIRR Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Fay School ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds Memorial Assistance Ministries ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN AT HEART FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Memorial Park Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds PNM TNMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN OUTDOOR DREAMS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Strake Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Corio Foundation · Larry and Anna B Harris Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Don & Colletta McMillian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Don & Colletta McMillian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Jack the Bike Man Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Don & Colletta McMillian’s filings →

More from the funding graph