Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Corio Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$850k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

International$4.4MEnvironment$4.0MEducation$2.9MHealth$1.5MHuman Services$955kAnimals$825kHousing & Shelter$650kFood & Nutrition$335kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $650k
  • $250k+7 grants · $2.9M
$100,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$97M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NUTURING MINDS OF AFRICA$850,000
MENAUL SCHOOL$525,300
BOSQUE SCHOOL$500,000
MAYO CLINIC$250,000
EARTH JUSTICE$250,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$250,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$250,000
SARANAM$100,000
ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NM$100,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NM$100,000
BARRETT FOUNDATION INC$50,000
WATERMELON MOUNTAIN RANCH$50,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$50,000
UNM FOUNDATION$50,000
EL RANCHITOS DE LOS NINOS$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $580k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $125k → 19%INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF HEARTS: $75k → 11%PATH: $75k → 14%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $75k → 19%INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF HEARTS: $50k → 11%EL RANCHITOS DE LOS NINOS: $50k → 19%EL RANCHITOS DE LOS NINOS: $50k → 19%EL RANCHITOS DE LOS NINOS: $50k → 19%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $30k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
WI
NY
MA
CA
NM
AR
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 26 repeat orgs$750k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
6

Total granted

$14M
$250k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+28%

Still filing today

81%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +121%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +39%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LP
    LA PUERTA DE LOS NINOSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +56%
  • P
    PATHgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +53%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
2
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
3
Nia Tero Foundation

Nia tero works alongside indigenous peoples to secure their guardianship of vital ecosystems. indigenous peoples are guardians of earth.(see schedule o)

Environment
4
Animal Protection New Mexico

To protect animals by creating systemic change resulting in the humane treatment of all animals. we create policies, infrastructure, and services that protect animals and strengthen our communities, and we design and implement humane and…

Animals
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
8
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
9
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
10
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals
11
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
12
New Mexico Environmental Law Center

To protect new mexico's communities and their air, land and water in the fight for environmental justice. the law center's effective legal advocacy and representation on environmental and environmental justice issues will protect new…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Pnm Tnmp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Health CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Land Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesChild and Family ServicesEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%45%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%44%35–55yr16%38%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $1,850,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND…EARTHJUSTICE — $1,400,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICECOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT — $270,000 · EnvironmentCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST N…FRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $150,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC — $150,000 · Environment+2 more — $100,000 · EnvironmentMENAUL SCHOOL — $2,425,300 · EducationMENAUL SCHOOLBosque School — $500,000 · EducationBosque SchoolPB&J FAMILY SERVICES INC — $400,000 · EducationPB&J FAMILY SERVICES I…+1 more — $15,000 · EducationNUTURING MINDS OF AFRICA — $1,800,000 · OtherNUTURING MINDS OF AFRICANURTURING MINDS OF AFRICA — $425,000 · OtherNURTURING MINDS OF AFRICAHEIFER INTERNATIONAL — $250,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALPNM TNMP FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherJOY JUNCTION INC — $145,000 · OtherSARANAM LLC — $425,000 · OtherSARANAM LLCBARRETT FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO — $300,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL N…ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $335,000 · OtherROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC+4 more — $315,000 · Other+4 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,800,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…+1 more — $10,000 · InternationalMAYO CLINIC — $1,500,000 · HealthMAYO CLINI…EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS INC — $380,000 · Human ServicesUnlikely Heroes Inc — $250,000 · Human ServicesInternational Network of Hearts — $125,000 · Human ServicesALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesPATH — $75,000 · Human ServicesANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC — $475,000 · AnimalsWATERMELON MOUNTAIN RANCH INC — $325,000 · Animals+1 more — $25,000 · Animals
Environment$3,920,000Education$3,340,300Other$4,295,000International$1,810,000Health$1,500,000Human Services$905,000Animals$825,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMENAUL SCHOOL — $2,425,300 over 4y, 11% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $1,850,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,800,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $1,500,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $1,400,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBosque School — $500,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC — $475,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSARANAM LLC — $425,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetPB&J FAMILY SERVICES INC — $400,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetEL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS INC — $380,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $335,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWATERMELON MOUNTAIN RANCH INC — $325,000 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO — $300,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT — $270,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetUnlikely Heroes Inc — $250,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $150,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOCEANA INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBARRETT FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPNM TNMP FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetInternational Network of Hearts — $125,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetFREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC — $115,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLA PUERTA DE LOS NINOS — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPATH — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc — $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Purposeful Rescue Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBLACK AND BROWN FOUNDERS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community…Pnm Tnmp FoundationThe Foundation for Su…Akerson Family Founda…King-Carpenter Founda…Don & Colletta McMill…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Santa Fe Community Fo…United Way WorldwideThe Minneapolis Found…Enterprise Holdings F…The Bank of America C…
Albuquerque Community FoundationNM23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · The Foundation for Sustainable Living · Akerson Family Foundation · King-Carpenter Foundation · Don & Colletta McMillian Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Minneapolis Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Corio Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines