Skip to content

· Private foundation

Don and Barbara Chapin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$94kYouth Development$79kRecreation & Sports$66kAnimals$50kArts & Culture$41kEducation$34kHuman Services$25kFood & Nutrition$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$926k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RANCHO CIELO$15,000
KEY FOR A CURE FOUNDATION$12,300
COASTAL KIDS HOMECARE$10,000
SPCA MONTEREY COUNTY$5,000
HARMONY AT HOME$5,000
YOSAL$5,000
CASA OF MONTEREY COUNTY$2,500
UNITED FOR SAN BENITO$2,500
SALINAS AREA RIF PROGRAM$2,500
SALINAS VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$2,500
YOUTH ON COURSE$2,500
SALINAS REGIONAL SPORTS AUTHORITY$2,500
SACRED HEART SCHOOL PARENTS CLUB$2,000
ERNIE CAMACHO ED FOUNDATION$1,500
MANZANITA LITTLE LEAGUE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $5k → 9%HARMONY AT HOME: $5k → 12%HARMONY AT HOME: $5k → 12%HARMONY AT HOME: $5k → 12%CANINE COMPANIONS: $1k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $3k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $3k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $2k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $1k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $750 → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $500 → 12%SUN STREET CENTERS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$409k · 42 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
40

Total granted

$409k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue ×13
  • RC
    RANCHO CIELO INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $55k · revenue +94%
  • SF
    Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County
    5× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • ES
    EL SISTEMA USASALINAS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +18%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL COAST
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • MJ
    Monterey Jr Cycling Development
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
So Cal Aces Baseball Club

Youth sports

Religion
2
Monterey Condors Club

Athletic youth support programs

Recreation & Sports
3
Monterey Bay United
Recreation & Sports
4
Santa Barbara Soccer Club

Provides youth soccer development and amateur athletic competition through coaching, training and competition.

Recreation & Sports
5
Monterey Bay Swim Club

Training, coaching and operating a youth swim team

Recreation & Sports
6
Monterey County Soccer League Monterey County Soccer Club

Monterey County Soccer Club is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the positive development of our youth through their participation in a safe health and affordable soccer program that is fun and rewarding for who participate

Recreation & Sports
7
Southern California Youth Cricket Academy

Provide access to youth cricket

Human Services
8
Monterey County Futbol Club

It is the mission of MCFC to provide the highest level of soccer to the youth of Monterey County while maintaining good sportsmanship values with quality coaching. Our goal is help young soccer players develop not only into better soccer…

—
9
Marin County Bicycle Coalition

To promote safe bicyling for everyday transportation and recreation. this is accomplished by working with local jurisdictions to design improved bicycle facilities, identifying project funding, and providing countywide bicycling education.

Education
10
Usa Softball of Southern California Santee
Recreation & Sports
11
Coastside Childrens Programs

Coastside childrens programs (ccp) mission is to provide a safe and caring environment where children learn through experience, play, and friendships - building a foundation for success in school and life. ccp is offering preschool…

Human Services
12
Casa of San Mateo County

The Organization recruits, trains and supports adult community volunteers who are assigned to advocate for youth, ages 0 through 21, who are in the child welfare or juvenile justice system. These volunteers are often the only consistent…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salinas Regional Sports Authority; the most unlike its peers is Peacock Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/36
Grantees still filing
24/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOSAL: $27,500 · OtherYOSALNCGA FOUNDATION: $13,500 · OtherNCGA FOUNDATIONMAX'S HELPING PAWS FOUNDATION: $13,500 · OtherMAX'S HELPING PAWS FOUNDATIONSNIP: $10,000 · OtherNORTH MONTEREY COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $7,500 · OtherSALINAS AREA READING FOR FUN PROGRAM: $9,000 · OtherCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc: $10,000 · Other+56 more: $116,170 · Other+56 moreCOASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $75,000 · HealthCOASTAL KIDS HOME CAREA KEY FOR A CURE FOUNDATION: $16,800 · HealthA KEY FOR A CURE FOUND…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $5,000 · HealthRANCHO CIELO INC: $54,500 · Youth DevelopmentRANCHO CIELO I…SAND CITY VOLLEYBALL INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentSAND CITY VOLL…NORTH COUNTY BULLDOGS INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentNORTH COUNTY B…+1 more: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentFUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $10,952 · Recreation & SportsFUTURE CI…HOPE HORSES & KIDS: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHOPE HORS…SALINAS REGIONAL SPORTS AUTHORITY: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsSALINAS R…Monterey Jr Cycling Development: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsMonterey …NORTH COUNTY YOUTH RECREATION ASSOC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTH COU…MANZANITA LITTLE LEAGUE: $4,850 · Recreation & SportsMANZANITA…MONTEREY COUNTY AIRSHOW ASSOC INC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsMONTEREY …HARMONY AT HOME: $15,000 · Human ServicesAnimal Friends Rescue Project: $9,750 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesSUN STREET CENTERS: $5,000 · Human ServicesMONTEREY COUNTY YOUTH MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEL SISTEMA USASALINAS INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureUnited for San Benito: $7,500 · Arts & CultureSAN BENITO STAGE COMPANY: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County: $25,500 · Animals
Other$207,170Health$101,800Youth Development$63,500Recreation & Sports$44,302Human Services$35,750Arts & Culture$26,000Animals$25,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $75,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $54,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County: $25,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA KEY FOR A CURE FOUNDATION: $16,800 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetHARMONY AT HOME: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAX'S HELPING PAWS FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetFUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $10,952 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE HORSES & KIDS: $10,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMONTEREY COUNTY YOUTH MUSEUM: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAnimal Friends Rescue Project: $9,750 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSALINAS AREA READING FOR FUN PROGRAM: $9,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetEL SISTEMA USASALINAS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUnited for San Benito: $7,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALINAS REGIONAL SPORTS AUTHORITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBrighter Bites Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUN STREET CENTERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COUNTY YOUTH RECREATION ASSOC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMANZANITA LITTLE LEAGUE: $4,850 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetSAND CITY VOLLEYBALL INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGen Giammanco Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPEACOCK ACRES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHollister FFA Alumni: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDOOR TO HOPE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY COUNTY AIRSHOW ASSOC INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLiveforRoss Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCASTROVILLE ARTICHOKE FESTIVAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN BENITO STAGE COMPANY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSALINAS BOWMEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO CIELO INC ↗
  • Who funds Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County ↗
  • Who funds A KEY FOR A CURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY AT HOME ↗
  • Who funds NCGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAX'S HELPING PAWS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HORSES & KIDS ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY COUNTY YOUTH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Animal Friends Rescue Project ↗
  • Who funds SALINAS AREA READING FOR FUN PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds EL SISTEMA USASALINAS INC ↗
  • Who funds United for San Benito ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINAS REGIONAL SPORTS AUTHORITY ↗
  • Who funds Brighter Bites Inc ↗
  • Who funds Monterey Jr Cycling Development ↗
  • Who funds SUN STREET CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTY YOUTH RECREATION ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds MANZANITA LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SAND CITY VOLLEYBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTY BULLDOGS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA32.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · Sally Hughes Church Foundation · Nancy Buck Ransom Foundation · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · Andrew & Phyllis D'Arrigo Charitable Foundation · Tanimura Family Foundation · Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula · Community Foundation for San Benito County · The Talbott Family Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Don and Barbara Chapin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Don and Barbara Chapin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Don and Barbara Chapin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Don and Barbara Chapin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Don and Barbara Chapin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph