How much did DLP POSITIVE RETURNS FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of DLP POSITIVE RETURNS FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

—

2022

—

2023

christian

2024

boys girlsreal estatechurchinternational

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $29k
$10k–50k7 grants · $197k
$50k–250k8 grants · $720k

$30,001

Median grant

States reached

$451k

Total assets

Largest grants

EQUIP LEADERSHIP$225,000
TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC$100,000
TRANSFORMING FUTURES$70,953
ALPHA-OMEGA MIRACLE HOME INC$64,700
PATHLIGHT INTERNATIONAL INC$59,685
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$50,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$50,000
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION$48,294
DLP REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC$44,362
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC$39,682
OMNAH FOUNDATION$30,001
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUNTAINS$13,439
HOLIDAYS WITH HEROES$10,978
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL 16492$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 8%. 77% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$700k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +493% since the first grant, against +134% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+493%

+134%

Still filing today

67%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $505k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

ReligionInternationalPhilanthropyAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +62%
TT
TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +684%
NC
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $140k · revenue +10158%

Funded once

HI
HALFTIME INSTITUTE
one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -14%
SP
SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $49k · revenue +134%
OG
OAK GROVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIESgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +1066%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion

Global Impact for Christ

To inspire, equip and facilitate the spreading of the gospel of jesus christ globally with education, cross-cultural training, and church planting.

Religion

Cawood Family So Inc

The foundation seeks to support and partner with ministries having measurable, effective impact in advancing the gospel, by stewarding funds as the holy spirit leads.

Philanthropy

National Christian Foundation --

Provides strategy for effective giving through donor advised funds and planned gifts.

Religion

Christianity Today International

Equipping Christians to renew their minds, serve the church, and create culture to the glory of God

Religion

Creation Investments Foundation Inc

To provide funding to charities in fulfillment of the exempt purposes of nccf.

Philanthropy

Outreach Foundation of the

Fueling the global mission of christ by growing trusted relationships and helping the church live out its missional calling.

—

Hope Worldwide Ltd

Motivated by god's love, we partner with our neighbors in need, equip volunteers, respond to disasters and strenghten communities to inspire greater hope in our world.

International

Impact for Living Inc

Provides conferences, seminars and consulting services to churches and others.

Religion

Christian Mission for the United Nations

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—

His Way At Work

Provide businesses with the guidance and support to gradually transform them into christ centered organizations that operate on virtue based principles and demonstrate christian caring.

Religion

The Timothy Initiative Inc

The timothy initiative exists to advance christ's kingdom by multiplying disciples and disciple making churches around the world.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Works Inc and the most unlike its peers is Travon Walker Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/20

Grantees still filing

18/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$796,775Philanthropy$352,558Religion$305,251Education$200,000International$184,685Health$70,370Animals$30,001

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DLP POSITIVE RETURNS FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OMNAH FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 853825948 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OMNAH FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 23% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Dlp Positive Returns Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dlp Positive Returns Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DLP POSITIVE RETURNS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dlp Positive Returns Foundation?

More from the funding graph

DLP POSITIVE RETURNS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dlp Positive Returns Foundation?

More from the funding graph