Skip to content

· Private foundation

Divide by Zero Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$122k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$226kInternational$115kArts & Culture$95kFood & Nutrition$93kPublic Safety & Disaster$82kHealth$47kEnvironment$32kAnimals$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KERA$20,000
WORLD CENTAL KITCHEN$15,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$15,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$15,000
PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$15,000
KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT$10,000
NANUBHAI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
GREAT COMMISSION OUTREACH$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$5,000
TERLINGUA FIRE & EMS$3,000
VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION$2,500
OPERATION KINDNESS$2,500
BIG BEND NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION$2,000
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%SITI AND JIDO PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
NY
PA
CA
AZ
KS
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$780k · 22 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$780k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+7%

Still filing today

73%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEnvironmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +98%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +249%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue ×34

Funded once

  • FN
    FEEDING NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +7%
  • SA
    Siti and Jido Park Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • KD
    KIPP DALLAS-FORT WORTH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
3
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation (foundation) is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. (npr). the foundation supports npr through various activities (e.g., conducting…

—
4
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
5
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
8
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. supports national public radio, inc.'s international news-gathering activities through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
9
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
10
Parks and Wildlife Foundation of Texas

Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…

Environment
11
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
12
Texas Future Farmers of America Foundation Inc

Building on the proven success of texas agriculture education and the texas ffa program, our mission is distinguished by the continued development, funding, and implementation of cutting edge learning opportunities focusing on academic…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca of Texas; the most unlike its peers is Siti and Jido Park Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCNANUBHAI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · InternationalNANUBHAI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $70,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $68,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOLKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT: $40,000 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENTTERLINGUA FIRE & EMS INC: $30,000 · OtherTERLINGUA FIRE & EMS INCWorld Centeral Kitchen Inc: $20,000 · OtherWorld Centeral Kitchen IncBIG BEND NATIONAL PARK: $15,000 · OtherSPCA: $11,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $12,000 · Other+14 more: $50,600 · Other+14 moreNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH TEXAS PUB…Dallas Museum of Art: $4,801 · Arts & CultureThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $50,000 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $28,000 · HealthEMERGENCY MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $9,860 · HealthGREAT COMMISSION OUTREACH: $5,000 · HealthFEEDING NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Food & NutritionAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $6,500 · Food & NutritionSPCA of Texas: $11,000 · AnimalsOPERATION KINDNESS: $5,000 · Animals
International$285,000Other$306,600Arts & Culture$114,801Education$50,000Health$42,860Food & Nutrition$26,500Animals$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $110,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNANUBHAI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 9y, 8.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $68,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTERLINGUA FIRE & EMS INC: $30,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSiti and Jido Park Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetKIPP DALLAS-FORT WORTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $9,860 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $6,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIPP Inc dba Knowledge is Power Program Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $4,801 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BEND NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE KATY TRAIL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds NANUBHAI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds TERLINGUA FIRE & EMS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
  • Who funds Siti and Jido Park Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIPP DALLAS-FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY MEDICINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds GREAT COMMISSION OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds KIPP Inc dba Knowledge is Power Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds ONE TREE PLANTED INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BIG BEND NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE KATY TRAIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Divide by Zero Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Divide by Zero Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Divide by Zero Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Divide by Zero Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Divide by Zero’s filings →

    More from the funding graph