Skip to content
Dimarchi Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dimarchi Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$166k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$399kFood & Nutrition$230kHousing & Shelter$121kEducation$93kHuman Services$70kAnimals$38kPhilanthropy$35kInternational$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $128k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON CATHOLIC$28,000
GLEANERS FOOD BANK$20,000
ST CHARLES BORROMEO CHURCH$15,000
HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK$15,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII$10,000
ST BRIGID$10,000
WHEELER MISSION$10,000
WHEELER MISSION$10,000
FERAL CAT FRIENDS BLOOMINGTON$5,500
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
CATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL$5,000
CHRISTEL HOUSE$5,000
PARK TUDOR SCHOOL$5,000
GILLISPIE SCHOOL$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GILLISPIE SCHOOL: $3k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $10k → 9%GILLISPIE SCHOOL: $2k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAI'I: $10k → 9%WHEELER MISSION: $10k → 18%WHEELER MISSION: $10k → 18%WHEELER MISSION: $10k → 18%WHEELER MISSION: $11k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $10k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $10k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $20k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
IN
OH
CA
CO
VA
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$961k · 21 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -22% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

$961k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-22%

Still filing today

71%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $185k · revenue +11%
  • WM
    WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $101k · revenue +9%
  • CH
    CHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $40k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • TIMMY GLOBAL HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -22%
  • AU
    ALOHA UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -15%
  • FC
    FERAL CAT FRIENDS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
Indiana University Health Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
6
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
7
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
8
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
9
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
10
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
11
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
12
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christel House International Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Nick Lackey Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON CATHOLIC: $336,296 · OtherST ELIZABETH ANN SETON CATHOLICGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $185,000 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INCSALVATION ARMY: $50,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYST BRIGID: $33,000 · Other+18 more: $106,775 · Other+18 moreWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $100,500 · Human ServicesWHEELER MISSI…CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHAR…THE GILLISPIE SCHOOL: $4,500 · Human ServicesIndiana University Foundation: $25,000 · EducationPARK TUDOR FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationPurdue Research Foundation: $3,000 · EducationHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $45,000 · Food & NutritionCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc: $3,000 · InternationalUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $20,000 · Religion
Other$711,071Human Services$125,000Education$48,000Food & Nutrition$45,000International$43,000Philanthropy$30,000Religion$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $185,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $100,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARK TUDOR FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIMMY GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDY NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC: $5,300 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHE GILLISPIE SCHOOL: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $3,325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NICK LACKEY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds PARK TUDOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds TIMMY GLOBAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds INDY NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GILLISPIE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds THE NICK LACKEY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncLumina Foundation for…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Renaissance Charitabl…Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…
Lilly Endowment IncIN16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dimarchi Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dimarchi Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dimarchi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home