Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dig Deeper Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.8MEmployment$600kFood & Nutrition$390kHuman Services$90kInternational$60kYouth Development$50kRecreation & Sports$25kEducation$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $465k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFE LEARNING CENTER$600,000
HAPPY CHURCH$465,000
SOUTHSHORE COMMUNITY CHURCH$100,000
PROJECT 5-2 MINISTRY$100,000
MASTER PROVISIONS$100,000
BACK 2 BACK MINISTRIES$60,000
SAM HUBBARD FOUNDATION$55,000
ST VINCENTE DE PAUL OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY$50,000
NAVIGATORS$15,000
THE LIT MOVEMENT$15,000
FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST$11,000
BOONE COUNTY 4H OUNCIL$10,941
URBAN OUTREACH NKYCINCINNATI$10,000
NEW LIFE ASSEMBLY OF GOD$10,000
KINGDOM INCLUSION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $670k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $600k → 11%LIT MOVEMENT: $10k → 16%THE LIT MOVEMENT: $15k → 16%THE LIT MOVEMENT: $10k → 16%THE LIT MOVEMENT: $10k → 16%THE LIT MOVEMENT: $5k → 16%THE LIT MOVEMENT: $5k → 16%NEW DAY RANCH: $5k → 7%NEW DAY RANCH: $5k → 7%NEW DAY RANCH: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IA
OH
UT
CO
MO
KY
AR
TN
NC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 20 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
18

Total granted

$2.0M
$228k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+6%

Still filing today

35%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $921k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MASTER PROVISIONS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $325k · revenue +63%
  • LM
    LIT MOVEMENT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +324%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • RO
    RIVER OF LIFE
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • WA
    WE ARE THE RIPPLE
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • LB
    LAKE BUFFUM BAPTIST CHURCH GOD'S HANDS FARM
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gospel Life Global Missions

Sending disciples to glorify god

—
2
Cross to Light Corporation

Cross to Light is a nondenominational Christian organization providing spiritual education and physical aid to people in need around the world. Since 2005, Cross to Light has helped people cross from darkness to light by hearing the Gospel…

Religion
3
Christian Life Ministries

Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…

Human Services
4
Word of Life Fellowship Inc

The purpose of Word of Life Fellowship is evangelization and discipleship through various means consistent with the Holy Scriptures to help build and strengthen the Church of Jesus Christ. Ministries include camps and conferences, youth…

Religion
5
Leadership Revolution Inc

Leadership Revolution is a ministry founded to develop leaders globally who will spread the gospel and make disciples in their arena of influence.

Religion
6
L2L Inc

To present Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord to business and professional men and to develop Christian business and professional men to carry out the Great Commission.

Religion
7
Waymaker International Ministries

WayMaker International Ministries is an inter-denominational mission organization committed to leading Christians in sharing Jesus Christ with the world, encouraging believers, and ministering to the international community.

Religion
8
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
9
Global Missions 365 Inc

To share the Gospel of Jesus Christ and support missionaries and ministries.

Religion
10
Lx Ministries Inc

Our mission is to multiply the global impact and influence of Christian leaders and pastors throughout their organizations and communities. Our activities involve working with members of the leadership of other exclusively charitable…

Religion
11
Gull Lake Ministries

Gull lake ministries provides bible based, christian retreats year-round for families, churches and organizations where we exalt jesus and share his truth.

Religion
12
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is New Day Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST: $531,000 · OtherFIRST CHURCH OF CHRISTTHE HAPPY CHURCH: $505,000 · OtherTHE HAPPY CHURCHMASTER PROVISIONS INC: $325,000 · OtherMASTER PROVISIONS INCPROJECT 5-2 MINISTRY: $290,000 · OtherPROJECT 5-2 MINISTRYSOUTH SHORE COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $100,000 · Other+35 more: $518,441 · Other+35 moreLife Learning Center Inc: $600,000 · Human ServicesLife Learning Center IncLIT MOVEMENT: $55,000 · Human ServicesLIT MOVEMENT+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesSam Hubbard Foundation: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBack 2 Back Ministries Inc: $60,000 · ReligionGREAT COMMISSION FELLOWSHIP MINISTRY: $20,000 · ReligionPOTTERS RANCH INC: $10,000 · Religion
Other$2,269,441Human Services$670,000Youth Development$110,000Religion$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLife Learning Center Inc: $600,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetMASTER PROVISIONS INC: $325,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetLIT MOVEMENT: $55,000 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT COMMISSION FELLOWSHIP MINISTRY: $20,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetNEW DAY RANCH: $15,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSPORTSMEN'S CLUB OF FORT WORTH CLUB INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPOTTERS RANCH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Life Learning Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MASTER PROVISIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Back 2 Back Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sam Hubbard Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LIT MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds GREAT COMMISSION FELLOWSHIP MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds NEW DAY RANCH ↗
  • Who funds SPORTSMEN'S CLUB OF FORT WORTH CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds POTTERS RANCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH18.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · George and Mary Jo Budig Family Foundati Foundation C/O George J Budig · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dig Deeper Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dig Deeper Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dig Deeper Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Dig Deeper Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dig Deeper’s filings →

    More from the funding graph