Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dianne H Ruthman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$144k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

62% of Dianne H Ruthman Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Orange County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Dianne H Ruthman Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $144k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’19
6
’20
4
’21
6
’22
1
’23
3
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$423kPhilanthropy$102kHuman Services$30kYouth Development$10kReligion$2kCivil Rights$500Other$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICE FOUNDATION$100,000
ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY$15,000
JEWISH FEDERATION AND FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
CURE PSP$10,000
HERITAGE POINTE$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB GREATER CONEJO VALLEY$2,500
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$500
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HERITAGE POINTE: $15k → 10%HERITAGE POINTE: $5k → 10%HERITAGE POINTE: $5k → 10%HERITAGE POINTE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$300k · 7 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$300k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+48%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CUREPSP INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $40k · revenue +154%
  • JH
    JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING OF ORANGE COUNTY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +4%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Greater Conejo Valley Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -63%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF NORTH HOLLYWOOD
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • BO
    BONEI OLAM
    one grant, 2024 · $900
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
2
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
3
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health
4
Council for Jewish Elderly

The mission of cje seniorlife is to enhance quality of life and facilitate independence of older adults. cje seniorlife values statement at cje seniorlife, we fulfill our mission and realize our vision for and on behalf of our clients, our…

Human Services
5
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
6
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
7
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
8
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
9
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
10
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
11
Jewish Family and Children's Services

Jewish family and children's services exists to provide professional and volunteer services for the purposes of developing, restoring, and maintaining the competency of families and individuals of all ages. traditionally, jewish family and…

Human Services
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Home for the Aging of Orange County; the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Club of Greater Conejo Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $162,780 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO &…ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $65,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTYCUREPSP INC: $40,000 · HealthCUREPSP INC+2 more: $5,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICE FO…+3 more: $5,800 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $102,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF…JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING OF ORANGE COUNTY: $30,000 · Human ServicesBoys & Girls Club of Greater Conejo Valley Inc: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 · Civil Rights
Health$272,780Other$155,800Philanthropy$102,000Human Services$30,000Youth Development$10,000Civil Rights$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $162,780 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $102,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $65,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCUREPSP INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING OF ORANGE COUNTY: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Greater Conejo Valley Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Judith Knell Binder Family FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Judith Knell Binder Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dianne H Ruthman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dianne H Ruthman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dianne H Ruthman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph