Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diane and Brent Rosenthal Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$110kHealth$6kArts & Culture$5kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$4kRecreation & Sports$3kEducation$3kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $41k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$290k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$40,849
INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION$2,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER MINNEAPOLIS$1,000
LUSTGARDEN FOUNDATION PANCREATIC CANCER RESEARCH$1,000
BREAKTHROUGH TID$1,000
ISRAEL BRIDGE$1,000
SANFORD COMMUNITY CENTER$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$600
HUMANE SOCIETY$500
CHILDRENS BURN FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC$500
SCRIPPS HEALTH FOUNDATION$300
Individual grant recipient$300
FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE IZZY FOUNDATION: $200 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $600 → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 12%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $100 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
SD
IA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$127k · 11 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$127k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+2%

Still filing today

64%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IT
    INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +95%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +42%
  • SC
    SANFORD CENTER
    2× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • PB
    PALM BEACH JEWISH FEDERATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • MN
    MIRACLE NETWORK-UNITY POINT HEALTH ST LUKES
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
8
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
9
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
10
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
11
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Burn Foundation of Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Choose Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $109,691 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM+15 more: $11,700 · Other+15 moreINSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC: $4,735 · Arts & CultureTHE ISRAEL BRIDGE: $3,000 · EducationKELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY: $1,000 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY: $3,600 · Youth DevelopmentBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTH: $550 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $500 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $100 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $1,100 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC: $500 · Human ServicesTHE IZZY FOUNDATION: $200 · Human ServicesCAMP HIGH HOPES: $100 · Human ServicesCHOOSE MINISTRY: $100 · Religion
Other$121,391Arts & Culture$4,735Education$4,000Youth Development$3,600Health$2,150Human Services$1,900Religion$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC: $4,735 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY: $3,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ISRAEL BRIDGE: $3,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSANFORD CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IZZY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP HIGH HOPES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOOSE MINISTRY: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY ↗
  • Who funds THE ISRAEL BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds KELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE IZZY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HIGH HOPES ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds CHOOSE MINISTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diane and Brent Rosenthal Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diane and Brent Rosenthal Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Diane and Brent Rosenthal Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph