Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diamond Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$169kFood & Nutrition$166kReligion$72kEducation$65kInternational$61kHuman Services$58kPublic Safety & Disaster$51kCivil Rights$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $72k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Colorado Gives$12,000
ARAPAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI$10,000
World Central Kitchen$10,000
Feeding America$10,000
Planned Parenthood$10,000
Smidt Heart Institute$10,000
Denver Rescue Mission$10,000
Anti-defamation League$5,930
Jewish Colorado$5,585
No Kid Hungry$5,250
Smile Train Inc$5,000
Heifer International$5,000
Food Bank of the Rockies$5,000
Advancement Project$2,160
Gorilla Fund$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Denver Rescue Mission: $10k → 12%Denver Rescue Mission: $10k → 12%Denver Rescue Mission: $5k → 12%Denver Rescue Mission: $5k → 12%Denver Rescue Mission: $5k → 12%Denver Rescue Mission: $5k → 12%Denver Rescue Mission: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
AR
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Diamond Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Diamond Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$626k · 31 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
19

Total granted

$626k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+3%

Still filing today

65%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionInternationalHealthEnvironmentEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    7× · 2018–2025 · $85k · revenue +77%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +167%
  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    7× · 2018–2025 · $47k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +56%
  • W
    WWWEDFOrg
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
8
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
18/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Planned Parenthood: $102,000 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $46,750 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHARAPAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $40,000 · OtherARAPAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIHeifer International: $37,000 · OtherHeifer InternationalACC Foundation: $32,000 · OtherACC FoundationSMILE TRAIN INC: $19,000 · OtherCONGREGATION HEBREW EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE: $14,770 · Other+30 more: $104,167 · Other+30 moreFeeding America: $85,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $27,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE …+3 more: $5,000 · Food & NutritionWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,250 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…International Rescue Committee INC: $12,150 · InternationalInternation…HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $5,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN C…UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · International+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalJEWISHColorado: $37,945 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $19,600 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $41,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc: $13,591 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $4,000 · HealthSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $22,895 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$395,687Food & Nutrition$117,000International$72,400Philanthropy$58,545Human Services$41,000Health$28,091Civil Rights$24,895

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFeeding America: $85,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $46,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $41,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $37,945 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $27,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $22,895 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $19,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $13,591 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $12,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $8,344 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $8,060 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA: $7,360 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $5,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $4,590 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $3,053 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $2,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER FREE COLORADO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEDONTWASTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALMINDED: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TIKVA CORP ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER FREE COLORADO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diamond Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diamond Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Diamond Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph