Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diaco Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$398k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.6MHealth$860kEducation$595kHuman Services$468kFood & Nutrition$190kInternational$130kPublic Safety & Disaster$95kPhilanthropy$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $345k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALESIAN SISTERS OF ST JOHN BOSCO$30,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION$20,000
OASIS$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
ST PETERS SCHOOL$15,000
SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
EVA'S KITCHEN$10,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK$10,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$10,000
HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL FOUNDATION$10,000
ST JOSEPH REGIONAL HS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
ST BARNABAS BURN FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $283k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%OASIS: $20k → 12%OASIS: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $20k → 7%OASIS: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $10k → 7%OASIS: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $10k → 7%OASIS: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $10k → 7%OASIS: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $10k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $10k → 7%OASIS: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $10k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $10k → 7%OASIS: $8k → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $10k → 7%OASIS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 41 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
1

Total granted

$4.1M
$1k

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +249%
  • OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +143%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE MAGNIFICAT CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
10
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oasis - a Haven for Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE MOST BLESSED SACRAMENT: $767,500 · OtherCHURCH OF THE MOST BLESSED SACRAMENTMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $235,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERDIOCESE OF PATERSON ST JOSEPH FUND: $195,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF PATERSON ST JOSEPH FUNDARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $170,000 · Other+29 more: $1,889,000 · Other+29 moreCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $100,000 · Human ServicesOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $92,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 · HealthTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50,000 · HealthRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $50,000 · EducationSOUND START BABIES PROGRAM FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING CHILDREN: $35,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationFREEDOM ALLIANCE: $85,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $45,000 · InternationalEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $90,000 · Community Improvement
Other$3,256,500Human Services$282,500Health$225,000Education$145,000International$130,000Community Improvement$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $100,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $95,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $92,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE: $85,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND START BABIES PROGRAM FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING CHILDREN: $35,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUND START BABIES PROGRAM FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diaco Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diaco Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Westfield Day Care Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Diaco Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph