· Private foundation
Dhiman Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $41k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DURGA TEMPLE OF WESTCHESTER | $41,153 |
| FEEDING WESTCHESTER | $6,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA | $3,650 |
| DUKHNIVARAN SIKH CULTURAL SOCIETY | $3,601 |
| PARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICA FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| THE SHARING SHELF | $2,000 |
| THE DOE FUND | $2,000 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| MAC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER | $1,500 |
| COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC | $1,003 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EVEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA7× · 2018–2024 · $39k · revenue +22%
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY7× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +76%- DSDUKHNIVARAN SIKH CULTURAL SOCIETY8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- IAIIM ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $15k
- NSNARAYAN SEWA SANSTHAN INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +42%
- HTHINDU TEMPLE OF TRI-STATE INCone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America and the most unlike its peers is Dukhnivaran Sikh Cultural Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds PARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DUKHNIVARAN SIKH CULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds NARAYAN SEWA SANSTHAN INC ↗
- Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds HINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds INDIAN AMERICAN CULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF WESTCHESTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SCARSDALE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds MERCY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE SHARING SHELF INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dhiman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.