Skip to content

· Private foundation

Devou Good Project Inc

Cultivate vibrant communities out of transitional neighborhoods.

$226k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$142k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Community Improvement$589kEnvironment$464kEducation$165kPublic Benefit$117kRecreation & Sports$99kHuman Services$48kReligion$39kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $142k
$26,212
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUSTAINABLE CINCY$141,637
Individual grant recipient$47,343
DEVOU PARK TRAIL COLLECTIVE$26,212
TRINITY CHURCH COVINGTON$6,315
COLLEGE HILL COMMUNITY COUNCIL$4,824
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%STRONG TOWNS: $500 → 11%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $5k → 17%CONGRESS FOR NEW URBANISM: $390 → 14%ALL ABOARD OHIO: $326 → 15%PRESERVE BURNET WOODS: $111 → 16%AMERICA WALKS: $8k → 6%NKY URBAN COMMUNITY & FORESTRY COUNCIL: $2k → 7%MAMOTH MUSIC FESTIVAL: $47k → 10%SUSTAINABLE CINCY: $142k → 11%TRI STATE TRAILS: $2k → 16%MAMOTH MUSIC FESTIVAL: $38k → 10%CITY OF COVINGTON: $101k → 11%ROCKDALE ACADEMY: $546 → 16%SUSTAINABLE CINCY: $76k → 11%COLLEGE HILL COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $450k → 16%TRINITY CHURCH COVINGTON: $27k → 11%COLLEGE HILL COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $12k → 16%DEVOU PARK TRAIL COLLECTIVE: $26k → 11%COLLEGE HILL COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $5k → 16%ESPERANZA LATINO CENTER: $25k → 11%NORTHSIDE COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $122 → 16%DEVOU PARK: $19k → 11%CINCINNATI PUBLIC LIBRARY: $19k → 16%OHIOANS FOR SAFE STREETS: $18k → 11%CITY OF CINCINNATI TRANSPORTATION AND ENGINEERING: $1k → 16%CITY OF COVINGTON: $16k → 11%CITY OF CINCINNATI TRANSPORTATION AND ENGINEERING: $848 → 16%FOURTH ST BRIDGE: $11k → 11%GIRL SCOUT BRIDGE: $8k → 11%DEVOU PARK TRAIL COLLECTIVE: $7k → 11%DEVOU PARK: $7k → 11%TRINITY CHURCH COVINGTON: $6k → 11%ESPERANZA LATINO CENTER: $5k → 11%TRINITY CHURCH COVINGTON: $4k → 11%DEVOU PARK: $3k → 11%RENAISSANCE COVINGTON: $2k → 11%CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER: $2k → 11%TRINITY CHURCH: $2k → 11%BOTANY HILLS URBAN JUNCTION: $400 → 11%DEVOU PROPERTIES INC DEVOU PARK: $200 → 11%CITY OF COVINGTON: $85 → 11%HONK HOMES: $20 → 11%TURKEYFOOT MIDDLE SCHOOL: $114k → 11%KENTON CO SCHOOLS: $32k → 11%TANK: $18k → 11%TEAM KENTON FOUNDATION INC KENTON CO SCHOOLS: $317 → 11%TANK: $14 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 13 repeat orgs$227k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +140% since the first grant, against +98% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
24

Total granted

$1.4M
$227k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+140%
+98%

Still filing today

8%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COLLEGE HILL COMMUNITY COUNCIL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $467k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2022 · $332k
  • SC
    SUSTAINABLE CINCY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $218k

Funded once

  • TM
    TURKEYFOOT MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $114k
  • KC
    KENTON CO SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $32k
  • CP
    CINCINNATI PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Downtown Council

The mission of the downtown council is to to create and maintain an urban environment that provides (1) economic reasons for businesses to be downtown, (2) a quality of life that encourages people to live downtown, and (3) enterainment and…

—
2
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
3
Commerce Lexington Inc

To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.

—
4
City Tech Collaborative

The mission of city tech collaborative (dba civic infrastructure collaborative) is to create public value from core urban infrastructure through cross-sector collaboration and technology enabled innovation.

Community Improvement
5
Kingston Land Trust Inc

Kingston Land Trust, Inc. (KLT) is a nonprofit organization established in 2010 for the purpose of protecting and preservation of urban and rural lands that include historic sites, wetlands, scenic areas, and forests in the City of…

Environment
6
Cumberland Trails Conference

Our mission is to provide financial and volunteer assistance with land acquisition, design, construction, and maintenance of the Cumberland Trail in Tennessee; to serve as an advocate for the Cumberland Trail and the regions bounding it in…

Recreation & Sports
7
United Way of Central Kentucky Inc

To improve lives by providing support through funding local agenies and performing community growth activities.

Human Services
8
Tri-County Economic Development Corporation

Build a world-class economy in northern kentucky through the expansion of existing businesses and the creation and attraction of high quality, primary industry employers.

—
9
Northern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to promote and support the development of strong businesses and a vibrant economy in the northern kentucky region, through leadership and advocacy, resulting in a better quality of life for all.

—
10
Cincinnati Parks Foundation

To build broad based private/public partnerships supporting the conservation and enhancement of our City's parks and greenspaces.

Recreation & Sports
11
Center for Great Neighborhoods of Covington

To Provide community support and programming in development, financial wellbeing, building healthy communities and partnerships for youth and families

Philanthropy
12
Cincinnati Regional Tourism Network

To encourage, foster, promote and market travel and tourism in cincinnati and northern kentucky.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America Walks Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Northside Community Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGE HILL COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $467,322 · OtherCOLLEGE HILL COMMUNITY COUNCILIndividual grant recipient: $331,661 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUSTAINABLE CINCY: $217,535 · OtherSUSTAINABLE CINCYCITY OF COVINGTON: $116,887 · OtherCITY OF COVINGTONTURKEYFOOT MIDDLE SCHOOL: $113,888 · OtherTURKEYFOOT MIDDLE SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $85,028 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+24 more: $249,397 · Other+24 moreTri-State Trails dba CROWN Cincinnati: $52,200 · Public BenefitAmerica Walks Inc: $7,507 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $4,500 · Recreation & SportsNORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDRENS LAW CENTER INC: $2,001 · Crime & LegalSTRONG TOWNS: $500 · Community ImprovementThe Northside Community Council: $122 · Community ImprovementTEAM KENTON FOUNDATION INC: $317 · Education
Other$1,581,718Public Benefit$52,200Recreation & Sports$12,007Crime & Legal$2,001Community Improvement$622Education$317

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTri-State Trails dba CROWN Cincinnati: $52,200 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetAmerica Walks Inc: $7,507 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRENAISSANCE COVINGTON INC: $2,198 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDRENS LAW CENTER INC: $2,001 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTRONG TOWNS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM KENTON FOUNDATION INC: $317 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetThe Northside Community Council: $122 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tri-State Trails dba CROWN Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds America Walks Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds RENAISSANCE COVINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDRENS LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds STRONG TOWNS ↗
  • Who funds TEAM KENTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Northside Community Council ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Devou Good Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Devou Good Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Devou Good Project Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Devou Good Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Devou Good Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph