Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Denver Petroleum Club Inc

Facilitate the economic growth of the oil and gas and other energy industries through business, social and networking events.

$41k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Education$29kHealth$29kHuman Services$19kEmployment$10kEnvironment$10kAnimals$10kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $26,364 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $41,363 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,999 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$8,788
Median grant
1
States reached
$123k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC$8,788
MAKE-A-WISH COLORADO$8,788
SEWALL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$8,788
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $9k → 8%WARREN VILLAGE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Invest in Kids

Invest in kids partners with local communities to ensure the success of evidence-based programs that improve the health and well-being of colorado's youngest children and their families.

Youth Development
2
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
3
Colorado Dream Foundation

We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary…

4
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
5
Denver Scholarship Foundation

Denver scholarship foundation (dsf) inspires and empowers denver public schools (dps) students to enroll in and graduate from postsecondary institutions of higher education by providing the tools, knowledge, and financial resources for…

Education
6
Mental Health Center of Denver

We empower people to overcome barriers and achieve lasting well-being through collaborative behavioral health care and comprehensive support.

Health
7
Denver Early Childhood Council

The vision of denver's early childhood council (the "council") is that denver is a community where the diverse needs of all children and their families are supported. the council elevates the early childhood field through innovative and…

Education
8
Denver Police Activities League Inc

The denver police activities league's (pal) mission is to create strong communities by providing under-resourced children with opportunities, exposure, and experiences with the intent of changing young people's lives in a positive way.

Youth Development
9
Mount St Vincent Home Inc

As part of intermountain health, mount saint vincent partners with children and families to heal beyond trauma into a healthy and hopeful future.

10
Delta Gamma Anchor Center for Blind Children

Part i and part iii, line 1: anchor center for blind children is a nationally recognized leader in teaching children with vision, cortical visual, dual sensory (vision and hearing), and co-occurring disabilities during their most formative…

11
Kent Denver Country Day School

Excellence in scholarship and character is the goal of a kent denver education. the school seeks to build a caring, diverse community of responsible citizens. to that end, the school provides a challenging college preparatory curriculum…

Education
12
Early Childhood Council Leadership Alliance Inc

Eccla advocates for and strengthens the accessibility, quality, and equity of local services and supports through a responsive statewide system of early childhood councils, to benefit colorado's young children, their families, and early…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Children's Home and the most unlike its peers is Dress for Success Denver. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DENVER CHILDREN'S HOME — $10,000 · HealthDENVER CHILDREN'S HOMEChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $10,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO — $8,788 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CO…ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $10,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOIC…SEWALL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $8,788 · EducationSEWALL CHILD DEVEL…WARREN VILLAGE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesWARREN VILLAGE INCFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $8,788 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DO…Dress for Success Denver — $10,000 · Public BenefitDress for…THE MAXFUND INC — $10,000 · AnimalsTHE MAXFU…ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING FOR KIDS — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentENVIRONME…SEEDS OF HOPE CHARITABLE TRUST — $10,000 · OtherSEEDS OF …FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $10,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK…
Health$28,788Education$18,788Human Services$18,788Public Benefit$10,000Animals$10,000Youth Development$10,000Other$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDress for Success Denver — $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAXFUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDENVER CHILDREN'S HOME — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING FOR KIDS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSEEDS OF HOPE CHARITABLE TRUST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO — $8,788 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $8,788 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEWALL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $8,788 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Denver Petroleum Club Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph