Skip to content

· Private foundation

Denver Kiwanis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$9k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Denver Kiwanis Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Colorado Gives Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Denver Kiwanis Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $46k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
11
’18
12
’19
12
’20
12
’21
13
’22
12
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$977kHuman Services$117kYouth Development$85kHealth$76kRecreation & Sports$40kReligion$15kEducation$11kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVE$9,000
SWEET DREAM IN A BAG$4,500
SECOND WIND FUND$3,500
FRIENDS OF PAHA$3,000
GRIFFITH CENTERS FOR CHILDREN$3,000
A PRECIOUS CHILD$2,500
ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN$2,500
LISTEN FOUNDATION$2,500
DENVER EAST HIGH RUGBY$2,500
BOY SCOUTS OF DENVER$2,500
MOUNT SAINT VINCENT$2,000
DENVER SANTA CLAUS SHOP$2,000
LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$2,000
SCHOLARS UNLIMITED$1,650
ROCKY MT DISTRICT FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 6%SWEET DREAM IN A BAG: $6k → 3%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%SWEET DREAM IN A BAG: $5k → 3%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%SWEET DREAM IN A BAG: $5k → 3%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%A Precious Child: $3k → 5%Sweet Dream in a Bag: $3k → 3%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%Sweet Dream in a Bag: $3k → 3%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%Friends of Paha: $3k → 7%Friends of Paha: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%There With Care: $3k → 12%There With Care: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 61% of Denver Kiwanis Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Denver Kiwanis Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 21 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$348k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+253%

Still filing today

52%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GRIFFITH CENTERS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $39k · revenue +24%
  • SW
    SECOND WIND FUND INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $24k · revenue +249%
  • SD
    SWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • BR
    BULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +253%
  • HG
    HIGHER GROUND YOUTH CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • KM
    Kepner Middle School
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Dream Foundation

We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary…

—
2
Parents Family and Friends of Lesbians and Gays of Denver

Support education and advocacy for LGBTQ + people and families

—
3
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
—
4
The Rise School of Denver

The purpose of the Rise School of Denver is to provide the highest quality inclusive early childhood education and therapy for children with and without developmental disabilities. We do this by providing exemplary school- and clinic-based…

Education
5
Colorado Access Foundation
Health
6
Denver Youth Program

Youth counseling and mentoring.

Youth Development
7
Denver Police Activities League Inc

The denver police activities league's (pal) mission is to create strong communities by providing under-resourced children with opportunities, exposure, and experiences with the intent of changing young people's lives in a positive way.

Youth Development
8
Denver Children's Home

Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.

Health
9
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
10
Heart and Hand Center

Heart & hand center is dedicated to a world with no opportunity gap. by creating a nurturing community, heart & hand empowers all young people to realize their potential.

Crime & Legal
11
Denver Scholarship Foundation

Denver scholarship foundation (dsf) inspires and empowers denver public schools (dps) students to enroll in and graduate from postsecondary institutions of higher education by providing the tools, knowledge, and financial resources for…

Education
12
Elevating Connections

Elevating Connections is dedicated to building sustained positive relationships for current & former youth in foster care-including those experiencing sibling separation-to find their voice & build meaningful community connections.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Griffith Centers; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Paha. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $972,125 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATIONLISTEN FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 · OtherLISTEN FOU…THE DENVER SANTA CLAUSE SHOP INC: $18,000 · OtherTHE DENVER…Denver East High School Rugby: $16,400 · OtherDenver Eas…DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $16,300 · OtherDELTA GAMM…MOUNT SAINT VINCENT: $15,379 · OtherMOUNT SAIN…BOY SCOUTS OF DENVER: $9,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS…Individual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherA TRUE CHANGE: $5,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 · OtherROCKY MT DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Other+6 more: $12,918 · Other+6 moreFRIENDS OF PAHA: $21,000 · Human ServicesSWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CARE: $18,128 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $15,500 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVES: $63,000 · Crime & LegalBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER: $2,500 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $1,000 · Crime & LegalGRIFFITH CENTERS: $38,500 · HealthLIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $17,000 · HealthSECOND WIND FUND INC: $23,500 · EducationSUMMER SCHOLARS: $8,650 · Education
Philanthropy$972,125Other$128,497Human Services$75,628Crime & Legal$66,500Health$55,500Education$32,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $972,125 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVES: $63,000 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetGRIFFITH CENTERS: $38,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND WIND FUND INC: $23,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC: $21,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetLISTEN FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE: $18,128 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DENVER SANTA CLAUSE SHOP INC: $18,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetLIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $16,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER SCHOLARS: $8,650 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTHE URBAN FARM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVES ↗
  • Who funds GRIFFITH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds SECOND WIND FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PAHA ↗
  • Who funds SWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC ↗
  • Who funds LISTEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
  • Who funds THE DENVER SANTA CLAUSE SHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds BULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND YOUTH CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN FARM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Denver Kiwanis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Denver Kiwanis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Denver Kiwanis Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Denver Kiwanis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Denver Kiwanis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph