Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Denver Kiwanis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$9k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Denver Kiwanis Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Community First Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Denver Kiwanis Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $46k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
17
11
18
12
19
12
20
12
21
13
22
12
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$977kHuman Services$117kYouth Development$85kHealth$76kRecreation & Sports$40kReligion$15kEducation$11kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVE$9,000
SWEET DREAM IN A BAG$4,500
SECOND WIND FUND$3,500
FRIENDS OF PAHA$3,000
GRIFFITH CENTERS FOR CHILDREN$3,000
DENVER EAST HIGH RUGBY$2,500
A PRECIOUS CHILD$2,500
ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN$2,500
LISTEN FOUNDATION$2,500
BOY SCOUTS OF DENVER$2,500
DENVER SANTA CLAUS SHOP$2,000
LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$2,000
MOUNT SAINT VINCENT$2,000
SCHOLARS UNLIMITED$1,650
ROCKY MT DISTRICT FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 6%SWEET DREAM IN A BAG: $6k → 3%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%SWEET DREAM IN A BAG: $5k → 3%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%SWEET DREAM IN A BAG: $5k → 3%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%Sweet Dream in a Bag: $3k → 3%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%Sweet Dream in a Bag: $3k → 3%A Precious Child: $3k → 5%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%Friends of Paha: $3k → 7%Friends of Paha: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF PAHA: $3k → 7%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%There With Care: $3k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%There With Care: $3k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 61% of Denver Kiwanis Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Denver Kiwanis Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$348k · 21 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$348k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+253%

Still filing today

52%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GRIFFITH CENTERS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $39k · revenue +24%
  • SW
    SECOND WIND FUND INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $24k · revenue +249%
  • SD
    SWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • BR
    BULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +253%
  • HG
    HIGHER GROUND YOUTH CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • KM
    Kepner Middle School
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Dream Foundation

We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary…

2
Parents Family and Friends of Lesbians and Gays of Denver

Support education and advocacy for LGBTQ + people and families

3
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
4
The Rise School of Denver

The purpose of the Rise School of Denver is to provide the highest quality inclusive early childhood education and therapy for children with and without developmental disabilities. We do this by providing exemplary school- and clinic-based…

Education
5
Colorado Access Foundation
Health
6
Denver Youth Program

Youth counseling and mentoring.

Youth Development
7
Denver Police Activities League Inc

The denver police activities league's (pal) mission is to create strong communities by providing under-resourced children with opportunities, exposure, and experiences with the intent of changing young people's lives in a positive way.

Youth Development
8
Denver Children's Home

Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.

Health
9
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
10
Heart and Hand Center

Heart & hand center is dedicated to a world with no opportunity gap. by creating a nurturing community, heart & hand empowers all young people to realize their potential.

Crime & Legal
11
Denver Scholarship Foundation

Denver scholarship foundation (dsf) inspires and empowers denver public schools (dps) students to enroll in and graduate from postsecondary institutions of higher education by providing the tools, knowledge, and financial resources for…

Education
12
Elevating Connections

Elevating Connections is dedicated to building sustained positive relationships for current & former youth in foster care-including those experiencing sibling separation-to find their voice & build meaningful community connections.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Griffith Centers and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Paha. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $972,125 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATIONLISTEN FOUNDATION INC — $19,500 · OtherLISTEN FOU…THE DENVER SANTA CLAUSE SHOP INC — $18,000 · OtherTHE DENVER…Denver East High School Rugby — $16,400 · OtherDenver Eas…DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN — $16,300 · OtherDELTA GAMM…MOUNT SAINT VINCENT — $15,379 · OtherMOUNT SAIN…BOY SCOUTS OF DENVER — $9,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS…Individual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherA TRUE CHANGE — $5,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $5,000 · OtherROCKY MT DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $4,500 · Other+6 more — $12,918 · Other+6 moreFRIENDS OF PAHA — $21,000 · Human ServicesSWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC — $21,000 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CARE — $18,128 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $15,500 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVES — $63,000 · Crime & LegalBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER — $2,500 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $1,000 · Crime & LegalGRIFFITH CENTERS — $38,500 · HealthLIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $17,000 · HealthSECOND WIND FUND INC — $23,500 · EducationSUMMER SCHOLARS — $8,650 · Education
Philanthropy$972,125Other$128,497Human Services$75,628Crime & Legal$66,500Health$55,500Education$32,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $972,125 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVES — $63,000 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetGRIFFITH CENTERS — $38,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND WIND FUND INC — $23,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC — $21,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetLISTEN FOUNDATION INC — $19,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE — $18,128 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DENVER SANTA CLAUSE SHOP INC — $18,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetLIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN — $16,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER SCHOLARS — $8,650 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTHE URBAN FARM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVES
  • Who funds GRIFFITH CENTERS
  • Who funds SECOND WIND FUND INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PAHA
  • Who funds SWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC
  • Who funds LISTEN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THERE WITH CARE
  • Who funds THE DENVER SANTA CLAUSE SHOP INC
  • Who funds LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN
  • Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC
  • Who funds SUMMER SCHOLARS
  • Who funds BULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND YOUTH CHALLENGE
  • Who funds THE URBAN FARM

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Denver Kiwanis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Denver Kiwanis Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Denver Kiwanis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph