Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Declaration of Trust for the Morgan & Belle Obrien Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of DECLARATION OF TRUST FOR THE MORGAN & BELLE OBRIEN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$109k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FESTIVAL CENTER INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%FESTIVAL CENTER INC: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$153k · 8 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$153k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+223%

Still filing today

88%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LANDMARK COLLEGE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $92k · revenue +34%
  • SH
    SUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +46%
  • CC
    CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • OA
    OFFENDER AID AND RESTORATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • DB
    DON BOSCO CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL AND CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Educare Dc

Educare dc's mission is to eliminate the opportunity gap for young children living in poverty and give them the skills necessary for success in kindergarten and beyond. we work at the intersection of practice, policy, and research to…

Human Services
2
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
3
Dc Bilingual Public Charter School

The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.

Education
4
Women's League Child Development Center Inc

The mission of the women's league child development center is to provide the highest quality early childhood education to children and families who are residents of the city of hartford. guided by developmentally appropriate practices, we…

Human Services
5
Briya Public Charter School

Briya pcs is a public charter school and is operating under a contract with the dc government through the dc public charter school board, providing high quality education for adults and children that empowers families through a culturally…

Education
6
The Campagna Center Inc

The campagna center,inc. (the center), is a community-based nonprofit organization in alexandria, va. the center operates a variety of programs to address the needs of children, youth and families. the center provides early childhood…

Human Services
7
Harlem Children's Zone Inc

We enhance the life for children and families in some of nyc's most devastated neighborhoods.

Human Services
8
Bender Jcc of Greater Washington

The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…

Human Services
9
Youthbuild Dc Public Charter School Inc

Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…

Education
10
Moco Kidsco Inc

Kid museum is our region's pioneering experiential museum and educational makerspace. we foster the "mind of a maker" in kids and youth, empowering the next generation with the skills to invent the future.

Arts & Culture
11
Concordia Place

Concordia place's continuum of programs support families throughout their children's development, from the neonatal period through college entry: home visiting for expecting parents and infants, early childhood education and care for…

Human Services
12
Harmony Dc Public Charter Schools

The mission of the charter school is to prepare students for higher learning in a safe, caring, and collaborative atmosphere through a quality learner-centered educational program with a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Horizons Greater Washington Inc and the most unlike its peers is Festival Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LANDMARK COLLEGE INC — $91,926 · OtherLANDMARK COLLEGE INCJubilee Jumpstart — $27,000 · OtherJubilee JumpstartCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INC — $8,250 · OtherCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INC+7 more — $8,335 · Other+7 moreSUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC — $11,875 · HealthWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $4,500 · Human ServicesFestival Center Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TA THE SU — $3,500 · EducationKENNEDY CHILDRENS CENTER — $2,000 · EducationTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $500 · Youth Development
Other$135,511Health$11,875Human Services$5,500Education$5,500Philanthropy$1,000Youth Development$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLANDMARK COLLEGE INC — $91,926 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJubilee Jumpstart — $27,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC — $11,875 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INC — $8,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TA THE SU — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKENNEDY CHILDRENS CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOME INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark FoundationMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Declaration of Trust for the Morgan & Belle Obrien Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Landmark College Inc1% of income from government
  • Suburban Hospital Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph